Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Estimating cougar densities in northeast Oregon using conservation detection dogs
by
Davidson, Gregory A.
, Johnson, Bruce K.
, Waits, Lisette P.
, Clark, Darren A.
, Adams, Jennifer R.
in
Animal populations
/ CAPWIRE
/ conservation detection dogs
/ cougar
/ density
/ Density estimation
/ DNA
/ Dogs
/ Edge effect
/ Estimation methods
/ Global positioning systems
/ GPS
/ mark-recapture
/ mountain lion
/ Polymerase chain reaction
/ Population estimates
/ population estimation
/ Population number
/ Puma concolor
/ Quantitative Approaches
/ scat detection dogs
/ SECR
/ spatially explicit capture-recapture
/ Wildcats
/ Wildlife
/ Wildlife conservation
/ Wildlife ecology
/ Wildlife management
/ Wildlife population estimation
2014
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Estimating cougar densities in northeast Oregon using conservation detection dogs
by
Davidson, Gregory A.
, Johnson, Bruce K.
, Waits, Lisette P.
, Clark, Darren A.
, Adams, Jennifer R.
in
Animal populations
/ CAPWIRE
/ conservation detection dogs
/ cougar
/ density
/ Density estimation
/ DNA
/ Dogs
/ Edge effect
/ Estimation methods
/ Global positioning systems
/ GPS
/ mark-recapture
/ mountain lion
/ Polymerase chain reaction
/ Population estimates
/ population estimation
/ Population number
/ Puma concolor
/ Quantitative Approaches
/ scat detection dogs
/ SECR
/ spatially explicit capture-recapture
/ Wildcats
/ Wildlife
/ Wildlife conservation
/ Wildlife ecology
/ Wildlife management
/ Wildlife population estimation
2014
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Estimating cougar densities in northeast Oregon using conservation detection dogs
by
Davidson, Gregory A.
, Johnson, Bruce K.
, Waits, Lisette P.
, Clark, Darren A.
, Adams, Jennifer R.
in
Animal populations
/ CAPWIRE
/ conservation detection dogs
/ cougar
/ density
/ Density estimation
/ DNA
/ Dogs
/ Edge effect
/ Estimation methods
/ Global positioning systems
/ GPS
/ mark-recapture
/ mountain lion
/ Polymerase chain reaction
/ Population estimates
/ population estimation
/ Population number
/ Puma concolor
/ Quantitative Approaches
/ scat detection dogs
/ SECR
/ spatially explicit capture-recapture
/ Wildcats
/ Wildlife
/ Wildlife conservation
/ Wildlife ecology
/ Wildlife management
/ Wildlife population estimation
2014
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Estimating cougar densities in northeast Oregon using conservation detection dogs
Journal Article
Estimating cougar densities in northeast Oregon using conservation detection dogs
2014
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Estimating densities of cougar (Puma concolor) is important for managing cougars and their prey but remains challenging because of cougar's elusive and solitary behavior. To evaluate a non-invasive, genetic capture-recapture method to estimate cougar population size and density, we surveyed a 220-km² area using conservation detection dogs trained to locate scat over a 4-week sampling period in northeast Oregon. We collected 272 scat samples and conducted DNA analysis on 249 samples from which we determined individual identification from 73 samples that represented 21 cougars (9 males and 12 females). We evaluated 4 models to estimate cougar densities: Huggins closed population capture-recapture (Huggins), CAPWIRE, multiple detections with Poisson (MDP), and spatially explicit capture-recapture (SECR). Population estimates for cougars using our study area were 26 (95% CI = 22-35, 9 males and 17 females) from Huggins models, 24 (95% CI = 21-30, 9 males and 15 females) from CAPWIRE, and 27 (95% CI = 24-42, 9 males and 18 females) from the MDP model. We accounted for the edge effect in density estimates caused by individuals whose home ranges included only a portion of the survey grid by buffering the study area using the mean home range radius of 8 cougars equipped with global positioning system collars on or near the study area. We estimated densities of 4.6 cougars/100 km² (95% CI = 3.8-8.3) for the Huggins model, 4.8 cougars/100 km² (95% CI = 4.2-7.8) for the MDP model, 4.2 cougars/100 km² (95% CI = 3.3-5.3) for the CAPWIRE model, and 5.0 cougars/100 km² (95% CI = 3.2-7.7) for the SECR model. Our results suggested estimating cougar densities using scat detection dogs could be feasible at a broader scale with less effort than other methods currently being used.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.