Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Maternal obesity in low-resource settings: a multicenter cohort study of labor and neonatal outcomes in Guinea
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Maternal obesity in low-resource settings: a multicenter cohort study of labor and neonatal outcomes in Guinea
Do you wish to request the book?
Maternal obesity in low-resource settings: a multicenter cohort study of labor and neonatal outcomes in Guinea
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Maternal obesity in low-resource settings: a multicenter cohort study of labor and neonatal outcomes in Guinea
2025
Overview
This study aimed to evaluate the impact of maternal obesity on obstetrical outcomes, including labor and delivery parameters, as well as maternal and neonatal prognosis.
This observational multicenter cohort study was conducted over 6 months in Conakry, where Guinea's two busiest maternity hospitals are located. A total of 295 obese women (body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2) and 590 normal-weight women (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m2) were included. Obstetrical characteristics and outcomes were compared between obese and normal-weight parturients.
Compared to normal-weight women, obese parturients had significantly higher risks of labor induction (RR = 1.6, 95% CI [1.1-2.3]), occipital-posterior fetal position (RR = 1.8, 95% CI [1.3-2.8]), prolonged second stage of labor (RR = 1.7, 95% CI [1.2-2.3]), and oxytocin administration for uterine hypo-contractility (RR = 1.8, 95% CI [1.3-2.4]). Increased rates were also observed for episiotomy (RR = 2.5, 95% CI [1.6-3.9]), vacuum-assisted delivery (RR = 1.9, 95% CI [1.1-3.6]), cesarean section (RR = 1.7, 95% CI [1.3-4.4]), postpartum hemorrhage (RR = 1.8, 95% CI [1.3-5.2]), and postcesarean wound infection (RR = 3.3, 95% CI [2.2-19.6]). Neonates born to obese women were at an increased risk of perinatal asphyxia (RR = 2.9, 95% CI [1.3-6.4]), low APGAR score both at 1 min (RR = 1.7, 95% CI [1.3-2.2]) and 10 min (RR = 1.7, 95% CI [1.2-2.5]), and the need for neonatal resuscitation (RR = 1.6, 95% CI [1.2-2.1]). No significant differences were observed between groups regarding the risk of breech presentation, the type of cephalic presentation (occipital-anterior versus occipital-posterior), or neonatal mortality.
In low-income settings, maternal obesity is associated with a significantly increased risk of adverse labor, delivery, and perinatal outcomes-mirroring patterns observed in higher-resource contexts. These findings underscore the need for enhanced healthcare provider training and the implementation of targeted maternal weight management strategies. Moreover, obstetrical protocols and clinical guidelines should be adapted based on maternal BMI to better address the specific risks associated with obesity in pregnancy.
