Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Study on the Uncertainty of Machine Learning Model for Earthquake-Induced Landslide Susceptibility Assessment
by
Feng, Haixia
, Hu, Qingwu
, Miao, Zelang
in
Algorithms
/ Artificial neural networks
/ Data processing
/ Earthquake prediction
/ earthquake-induced landslide
/ Earthquakes
/ Landslides
/ Landslides & mudslides
/ Learning algorithms
/ Machine learning
/ model uncertainty
/ Neural networks
/ prediction
/ regression analysis
/ risk
/ River networks
/ Seismic activity
/ Seismic response
/ Statistical analysis
/ Support vector machines
/ Susceptibility
/ susceptibility assessment
/ Uncertainty
2022
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Study on the Uncertainty of Machine Learning Model for Earthquake-Induced Landslide Susceptibility Assessment
by
Feng, Haixia
, Hu, Qingwu
, Miao, Zelang
in
Algorithms
/ Artificial neural networks
/ Data processing
/ Earthquake prediction
/ earthquake-induced landslide
/ Earthquakes
/ Landslides
/ Landslides & mudslides
/ Learning algorithms
/ Machine learning
/ model uncertainty
/ Neural networks
/ prediction
/ regression analysis
/ risk
/ River networks
/ Seismic activity
/ Seismic response
/ Statistical analysis
/ Support vector machines
/ Susceptibility
/ susceptibility assessment
/ Uncertainty
2022
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Study on the Uncertainty of Machine Learning Model for Earthquake-Induced Landslide Susceptibility Assessment
by
Feng, Haixia
, Hu, Qingwu
, Miao, Zelang
in
Algorithms
/ Artificial neural networks
/ Data processing
/ Earthquake prediction
/ earthquake-induced landslide
/ Earthquakes
/ Landslides
/ Landslides & mudslides
/ Learning algorithms
/ Machine learning
/ model uncertainty
/ Neural networks
/ prediction
/ regression analysis
/ risk
/ River networks
/ Seismic activity
/ Seismic response
/ Statistical analysis
/ Support vector machines
/ Susceptibility
/ susceptibility assessment
/ Uncertainty
2022
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Study on the Uncertainty of Machine Learning Model for Earthquake-Induced Landslide Susceptibility Assessment
Journal Article
Study on the Uncertainty of Machine Learning Model for Earthquake-Induced Landslide Susceptibility Assessment
2022
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The landslide susceptibility assessment based on machine learning can accurately predict the probability of landslides happening in the region. However, there are uncertainties in machine learning applications. In this paper, Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Logistic Regression (LR) are used to assess the landslide susceptibility in order to discuss the model uncertainty. The model uncertainty is explained in three ways: landslide susceptibility zoning result, risk area (high and extremely high) statistics, and the area under Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (ROC). The findings indicate that: (1) Landslides are restricted by influence factors and have the distribution law of relatively concentrated and strip-shaped distribution in space. (2) The percentage of real landslide in risk area is 86%, 87%, 82%, and 61% in SVM, RF, LR, and ANN, respectively. The area under ROC of RF, SVM, LR, and ANN, respectively, is 90.92%, 80.45%, 73.75%, and 71.95%. (3) Compared with the prediction accuracy of the training set and test set from the same earthquake, the accuracy of landslide prediction in the different earthquakes is reduced.
Publisher
MDPI AG
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.