Journal Article

Environmental assessment of a new building envelope material derived from urban agriculture wastes: the case of the tomato plants stems

Rieradevall, Joan, Sierra-Perez, Jorge, Scaccianoce, Gianluca, Llorach-Massana, Pere, Cirrincione, Laura, La Gennusa, Maria, Peña, Javier

2023

Overview

PurposeDecarbonizing cities is one of today’s biggest challenges. In this regard, particular attention has been paid on improving the environmental performance of buildings. In this framework, this work consists in assessing the environmental impact of an innovative building envelope component derived from urban agriculture (UA) wastes. In fact, rooftop UA seems to be a possible solution to the rising food demand due to increasing urban demographic growth. Consequently, rooftop UA wastes need to be treated in sustainable ways.MethodsThis study aims to determine the carbon footprint and embodied energy of a new infill wall material, derived from UA wastes produced by a building rooftop greenhouse tomato crop, and evaluate the potential biogenic carbon that such by-product could fix temporally until its end of life. After an initial description of the manufacturing process of the new material, its carbon footprint and embodied energy have been calculated by means of the life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology according to the ISO 14044 and the ISO 14067 guidelines adapted to the analyzed context. In particular, the inventory analysis is based on data collected from the production of samples of the new material at the laboratory scale.Results and discussionThe results of the LCA indicate that, when the biogenic carbon fixed in the UA wastes is considered, a negative carbon footprint of − 0.2 kg CO2 eq. per kg of material can be obtained. Hence, it can be assumed that from a life cycle perspective the material is able to fix carbon emissions instead of emitting them. Specifically, for the considered scenario, approximately 0.42 kg CO2 eq./m2 per year could be sequestered. However, the crop area required to produce enough waste to manufacture a unit of material is quite high. Therefore, future studies should focus on individuate solutions to reduce the density of the new component, and also different urban crops with higher waste production rates.ConclusionsThe outcomes of the study put in evidence the potential of the new proposed infill wall component in fixing carbon emissions from UA, allowing to also compensate those relating to the production and transportation stages of the component life cycle. Moreover, producing by-products with UA wastes, hence temporally storing the carbon fixed by crops, may contribute to reduce the carbon cycles speed conversely to traditional waste management solutions, other than lower new raw materials depletion.

• Publisher: Springer Nature B.V
• Subject: Agricultural wastes / Agriculture / Building envelopes / Byproducts / Carbon cycle / Carbon dioxide / Carbon footprint / Crops / Decarbonization / Emissions / End of life / Environmental assessment / Environmental impact / Environmental performance / Farm buildings / Footprint analysis / Life cycle analysis / Life cycle assessment / Life cycles / Manufacturing industry / Raw materials / Tomatoes / Urban agriculture / Urban farming / Waste management / Wastes