Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Disentangling the Effects of Atmospheric and Soil Dryness on Autumn Phenology across the Northern Hemisphere
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Disentangling the Effects of Atmospheric and Soil Dryness on Autumn Phenology across the Northern Hemisphere
Do you wish to request the book?
Disentangling the Effects of Atmospheric and Soil Dryness on Autumn Phenology across the Northern Hemisphere
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Disentangling the Effects of Atmospheric and Soil Dryness on Autumn Phenology across the Northern Hemisphere
2024
Overview
In recent decades, drought has intensified along with continuous global warming, significantly impacting terrestrial vegetation. High atmospheric water demand, indicated by vapor pressure deficit (VPD), and insufficient soil moisture (SM) are considered the primary factors causing drought stress in vegetation. However, the influences of VPD and SM on the autumn phenology are still unknown. Using satellite observations and meteorological data, we examined the impacts of VPD and SM on the end of the growing season (EOS) across the Northern Hemisphere (>30°N) from 1982 to 2022. We found that VPD and SM were as important as temperature, precipitation, and radiation in controlling the variations in the EOS. Moreover, the EOS was predominantly influenced by VPD or SM in more than one-third (33.8%) of the study area. In particular, a ridge regression analysis indicated that the EOS was more sensitive to VPD than to SM and the other climatic factors, with 25% of the pixels showing the highest sensitivity to VPD. In addition, the effects of VPD and SM on the EOS varied among biome types and climate zones. VPD significantly advanced the EOS in 25.8% of temperate grasslands, while SM had the greatest impact on advancing the EOS in 17.7% of temperate coniferous forests. Additionally, 27.7% of the midlatitude steppe (BSk) exhibited a significant negative correlation between VPD and the EOS, while 19.4% of the marine west coast climate (Cfb) showed a positive correlation between SM and the EOS. We also demonstrated that the correlation between VPD and the EOS was linearly affected by VPD and the leaf area index, while the correlation between SM and the EOS was affected by SM, precipitation, and the leaf area index. Our study highlights the importance of VPD and SM in regulating autumn phenology and enhances our understanding of terrestrial ecosystem responses to climate change.
