Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Review and Comparison of Genetic Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization in the Optimal Power Flow Problem
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Review and Comparison of Genetic Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization in the Optimal Power Flow Problem
Do you wish to request the book?
Review and Comparison of Genetic Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization in the Optimal Power Flow Problem
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Review and Comparison of Genetic Algorithm and Particle Swarm Optimization in the Optimal Power Flow Problem
2023
Overview
Metaheuristic optimization techniques have successfully been used to solve the Optimal Power Flow (OPF) problem, addressing the shortcomings of mathematical optimization techniques. Two of the most popular metaheuristics are the Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). The literature surrounding GA and PSO OPF is vast and not adequately organized. This work filled this gap by reviewing the most prominent works and analyzing the different traits of GA OPF works along seven axes, and of PSO OPF along four axes. Subsequently, cross-comparison between GA and PSO OPF works was undertaken, using the reported results of the reviewed works that use the IEEE 30-bus network to assess the performance and accuracy of each method. Where possible, the practices used in GA and PSO OPF were compared with literature suggestions from other domains. The cross-comparison aimed to act as a first step towards the standardization of GA and PSO OPF, as it can be used to draw preliminary conclusions regarding the tuning of hyper-parameters of GA and PSO OPF. The analysis of the cross-comparison results indicated that works using both GA and PSO OPF offer remarkable accuracy (with GA OPF having a slight edge) and that PSO OPF involves less computational burden.
