MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Metatarsal Pronation on Radiographs: A Prospective Reliability Study of Visual Rotation Markers in Hallux Valgus
Metatarsal Pronation on Radiographs: A Prospective Reliability Study of Visual Rotation Markers in Hallux Valgus
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Metatarsal Pronation on Radiographs: A Prospective Reliability Study of Visual Rotation Markers in Hallux Valgus
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Metatarsal Pronation on Radiographs: A Prospective Reliability Study of Visual Rotation Markers in Hallux Valgus
Metatarsal Pronation on Radiographs: A Prospective Reliability Study of Visual Rotation Markers in Hallux Valgus

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Metatarsal Pronation on Radiographs: A Prospective Reliability Study of Visual Rotation Markers in Hallux Valgus
Metatarsal Pronation on Radiographs: A Prospective Reliability Study of Visual Rotation Markers in Hallux Valgus
Journal Article

Metatarsal Pronation on Radiographs: A Prospective Reliability Study of Visual Rotation Markers in Hallux Valgus

2025
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background: Rotational malalignment of the first metatarsal is increasingly recognized as a key feature of hallux valgus deformity, but the reliability of radiographic rotation markers remains uncertain. This study assessed the inter- and intraobserver reliability of 4 commonly used radiographic parameters: metatarsal pronation angle (MPA), tibial sesamoid position (TSP), lateral head shape (LHS), and round head sign (RH). Methods: In this prospective reliability study, 3 senior clinicians independently evaluated weightbearing anteroposterior and axial sesamoid radiographs of 75 hallux valgus cases on 2 occasions. Metatarsal pronation angle (MPA) was measured as a continuous variable and analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Tibial sesamoid position (TSP), lateral head shape (LHS), and round head sign (RH) were graded using ordinal scales and assessed with weighted kappa statistics (κ). Subgroup analyses evaluated whether reliability varied by deformity severity (hallux valgus angle) or increased distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA > 10 degrees). Results: MPA showed excellent agreement (ICC = 0.81-0.94). TSP also demonstrated high reliability (κ = 0.88-0.98), although its value as a rotation marker is limited. LHS showed moderate to substantial agreement (κ = 0.59-0.85), whereas RH had fair to moderate reliability (κ = 0.35-0.66). RH was least reliable in mild deformities, whereas other parameters remained stable across subgroups, with slightly lower values in cases with elevated DMAA. Conclusions: Conventional radiographs offer reliable assessment of MPA and TSP. LHS provides acceptable reproducibility, whereas RH is less consistent. These findings support the use of selected radiographic markers and suggest that further validation against 3-dimensional imaging and standardized grading frameworks may improve consistency and clinical applicability. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series. Graphical Abstract
Publisher
SAGE Publications,Sage Publications Ltd,SAGE Publishing