Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Isoperistaltic versus antiperistaltic ileocolic anastomosis. Does it really matter? Results from a randomised clinical trial (ISOVANTI)
by
Rufete, María Dolores
, Abrisqueta, Jesús
, Parrilla, Pascual
, Hernández, Quiteria
, Ibáñez, Noelia
, Luján, Juan
in
Clinical trials
/ Colorectal cancer
/ Laparoscopy
2019
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Isoperistaltic versus antiperistaltic ileocolic anastomosis. Does it really matter? Results from a randomised clinical trial (ISOVANTI)
by
Rufete, María Dolores
, Abrisqueta, Jesús
, Parrilla, Pascual
, Hernández, Quiteria
, Ibáñez, Noelia
, Luján, Juan
in
Clinical trials
/ Colorectal cancer
/ Laparoscopy
2019
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Isoperistaltic versus antiperistaltic ileocolic anastomosis. Does it really matter? Results from a randomised clinical trial (ISOVANTI)
by
Rufete, María Dolores
, Abrisqueta, Jesús
, Parrilla, Pascual
, Hernández, Quiteria
, Ibáñez, Noelia
, Luján, Juan
in
Clinical trials
/ Colorectal cancer
/ Laparoscopy
2019
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Isoperistaltic versus antiperistaltic ileocolic anastomosis. Does it really matter? Results from a randomised clinical trial (ISOVANTI)
Journal Article
Isoperistaltic versus antiperistaltic ileocolic anastomosis. Does it really matter? Results from a randomised clinical trial (ISOVANTI)
2019
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
BackgroundRight hemicolectomy is a very common surgery. Many studies compare different options for laparoscopic ileocolic anastomoses: intra- or extracorporeal; handsewn or stapled; side-to-side or end-to-side. However, there are no studies about the influence that peristalsis could have on this anastomosis. The aim of this study is to compare safety and feasibility of isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic anastomosis in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality between both groups. The secondary endpoint is to compare long-term functional outcomes (chronic diarrhoea) and quality of life (GIQLI questionnaire) after a 1-year follow-up period.MethodsA double-blind, randomised, prospective trial in patients undergoing scheduled surgery for right colon cancer with laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and isoperistaltic (ISO) or antiperistaltic (ANTI) ileocolic anastomoses.ResultsHundred and eight patients were included in the study. Patients were randomised either to isoperistaltic or antiperistaltic configuration (54 ISO/ANTI). No significant differences in baseline variables were found. No differences in surgical time (130 [120–150] min ISO vs. 140 [127–160] ANTI, p = 0.481), nor in anastomotic time (19 [17–22] vs. 20 [16–25], p = 0.207) and nor in postoperative complications: 37.0% ISO versus 40.7% ANTI, (p = 0.693) were found. There were no differences in postoperative ileus (p = 0.112) nor in anastomotic leakage (3.7% vs. 5.56%, p = 1.00). Differences in “time to first flatus” and “time to first deposition” were found in favour of the antiperistaltic group (p = 0.004 and p = 0.017). Anastomotic configuration did not influence hospital stay (3 days [2–6] isoperistaltic vs. 3 [2–4] antiperistaltic, p = 0.236). During follow-up, there were no differences between the two groups at 1, 6 and 12 months (p = 0.154, p = 0.498 and p = 0.683), nor in chronic diarrhoea rates in GIQLI scores (24% ISO vs. 31.4% ANTI, p = 0.541).ConclusionsThe isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic ileocolic anastomosis present similar results in terms of performance, safety and functionality. However, further studies must be carried out in order to assess relationship between postoperative ileus and anastomosis configuration.Trial registrationRandomised Clinical trial (Identifier: NCT02309931).
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.