Journal Article

Continuous Eddy Simulation vs. Resolution-Imposing Simulation Methods for Turbulent Flows

Fagbade, Adeyemi, Heinz, Stefan

2024

Overview

The usual concept of simulation methods for turbulent flows is to impose a certain (partial) flow resolution. This concept becomes problematic away from limit regimes of no or an almost complete flow resolution: discrepancies between the imposed and actual flow resolution may imply an unreliable model behavior and high computational cost to compensate for simulation deficiencies. An exact mathematical approach based on variational analysis provides a solution to these problems. Minimal error continuous eddy simulation (CES) designed in this way enables simulations in which the model actively responds to variations in flow resolution by increasing or decreasing its contribution to the simulation as required. This paper presents the first application of CES methods to a moderately complex, relatively high Reynolds number turbulent flow simulation: the NASA wall-mounted hump flow. It is shown that CES performs equally well or better than almost resolving simulation methods at a little fraction of computational cost. Significant computational cost and performance advantages are reported in comparison to popular partially resolving simulation methods including detached eddy simulation and wall-modeled large eddy simulation. Characteristic features of the asymptotic flow structure are identified on the basis of CES simulations.

• Publisher: MDPI AG
• Subject: Computational efficiency / computational fluid dynamics / Computing costs / Detached eddy simulation / Eddies / Flow simulation / Fluid dynamics / Fluid flow / High Reynolds number / hybrid RANS-LES methods / Hybridization / Large eddy simulation / large eddy simulation (LES) / Reynolds number / Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) methods / Simulation / Simulation methods / Turbulence models / Turbulent flow / Viscosity / Vortices / Wake turbulence