Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Quality of reporting of pre-recorded music interventions in surgical patients ‐ A systematic review
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Quality of reporting of pre-recorded music interventions in surgical patients ‐ A systematic review
Do you wish to request the book?
Quality of reporting of pre-recorded music interventions in surgical patients ‐ A systematic review
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Quality of reporting of pre-recorded music interventions in surgical patients ‐ A systematic review
2025
Overview
Perioperative music interventions are promising, with substantial beneficial effects on patients. However, adequate reporting is crucial for interpreting the outcomes and implementing the interventions. Our objective is to analyze the reporting quality of perioperative music interventions and to provide recommendations and a research agenda for future trials.
This study utilized data from a systematic review, that was conducted as part of a separate previous analysis by Geensen, Dirven et al. For this analysis, a PROSPERO registration (CRD42023427138) was formalized. The Template for intervention Description and Replication (TiDieR) checklist was adapted and used. Nineteen intervention items were assessed, categorized in the aim, the core and the implementation.
Due to narrowed inclusion criteria, ten music intervention studies were included. None of the studies completely reported all intervention items. The reporting of core intervention items were poorly described. Complete description of implementation items, such as fidelity and modifications, was scarce.
Perioperative music studies often lack the complete reporting of essential intervention items. This hinders replicability, generalization of the results and might contribute to research waste. We recommend adequate reporting in future studies to avoid these problems, by using our adapted TIDieR checklist.
•This is the first systematic review evaluating music intervention reporting using the TiDieR checklist.•Insufficient reporting was present in all included studies, impairing future implementation.•Potential to enhance reporting in tailoring and adherence assessments exists.•Our adapted checklist and research agenda are recommended for future research.
Publisher
Elsevier Ltd,Elsevier Limited,Elsevier
Subject
