Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The R-AI-DIOLOGY checklist: a practical checklist for evaluation of artificial intelligence tools in clinical neuroradiology
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The R-AI-DIOLOGY checklist: a practical checklist for evaluation of artificial intelligence tools in clinical neuroradiology
Do you wish to request the book?
The R-AI-DIOLOGY checklist: a practical checklist for evaluation of artificial intelligence tools in clinical neuroradiology
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
The R-AI-DIOLOGY checklist: a practical checklist for evaluation of artificial intelligence tools in clinical neuroradiology
2022
Overview
Artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools are gradually blending into the clinical neuroradiology practice. Due to increasing complexity and diversity of such AI tools, it is not always obvious for the clinical neuroradiologist to capture the technical specifications of these applications, notably as commercial tools very rarely provide full details. The clinical neuroradiologist is thus confronted with the increasing dilemma to base clinical decisions on the output of AI tools without knowing in detail what is happening inside the “black box” of those AI applications. This dilemma is aggravated by the fact that currently, no established and generally accepted rules exist concerning best clinical practice and scientific and clinical validation nor for the medico-legal consequences in cases of wrong diagnoses. The current review article provides a practical checklist of essential points, intended to aid the user to identify and double-check necessary aspects, although we are aware that not all this information may be readily available at this stage, even for certified and commercially available AI tools. Furthermore, we therefore suggest that the developers of AI applications provide this information.
