Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Residual least-squares collocation: use of covariance matrices from high-resolution global geopotential models
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Residual least-squares collocation: use of covariance matrices from high-resolution global geopotential models
Do you wish to request the book?
Residual least-squares collocation: use of covariance matrices from high-resolution global geopotential models
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Residual least-squares collocation: use of covariance matrices from high-resolution global geopotential models
2019
Overview
The paper presents a modified formulation of least-squares collocation. This residual least-squares collocation (RLSC) includes a remove–compute–restore procedure with a high-resolution global geopotential model (GGM) and a topographic gravitational potential model. In contrast to previous approaches, in RLSC, the remaining input residuals are modeled with error covariance matrices instead of signal covariance matrices. Therefore, we include the full variance–covariance information of a high-resolution GGM, namely the XGM2016, to the procedure. The included covariance matrices are anisotropic and location-dependent and enable a realistic error modeling of a target area. This fact represents an advantage over covariance matrices derived from signal degree variances or empirical covariance fitting. Additionally, due to the stochastic modeling of all involved components, RLSC provides realistic accuracy estimates. In a synthetic closed-loop test case with a realistic data distribution in the Andes we demonstrate the advantages of RLSC for regional geoid modeling and quantify the benefit which results mainly from a rigorously handled high-resolution GGM. In terms of root mean square deviations from the true reference solution, RLSC delivers an improvement of about 30% compared to a standard LSC approach, where the benefit is particularly pronounced in areas with a sparse data distribution. This improved performance, together with the fact that the resulting stochastic error estimates better reflect the true errors, might be an important aspect for the application of RLSC to derive gravity potential values and their uncertainties at reference stations of the international height reference system.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
Subject
