Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Performance of HSC Continuous Deep Beams with Asymmetric Circular Openings: Hybrid FRP Versus Steel Plate Strengthening
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Performance of HSC Continuous Deep Beams with Asymmetric Circular Openings: Hybrid FRP Versus Steel Plate Strengthening
Do you wish to request the book?
Performance of HSC Continuous Deep Beams with Asymmetric Circular Openings: Hybrid FRP Versus Steel Plate Strengthening
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Performance of HSC Continuous Deep Beams with Asymmetric Circular Openings: Hybrid FRP Versus Steel Plate Strengthening
2025
Overview
In recent years, the demand for high-strength concrete (HSC) for buildings has been steadily increasing. Continuous HSC deep beams are frequently employed in various structural applications, including high-rise buildings, bridges, and parking garages, due to their superior load capacity. Some cases require the addition of openings after the construction for passing utilities such as drainage and electricity. This study experimentally examines four two-span HSC deep beams: one control solid beam, one beam with circular openings, and two beams that utilized different strengthening schemes. The openings were asymmetrical circular openings, with one positioned in each span. This study sought to regain the full capacity of beams with openings by employing two types of strengthening schemes. The first one used bolted steel plates, while the second was a hybrid scheme that combined bolted steel plates with externally bonded fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) sheets. Test findings demonstrated that both methods effectively restored the load capacity of the strengthened beams. The strengthened beam with steel plates achieved a load capacity of 125% compared to the solid beam. Likewise, the beam retrofitted with hybrid steel/FRP composites reached 117%. Additionally, the energy dissipation and ductility index of the strengthened beam with steel plates were 32% and 77%, respectively, compared to the strengthened beam with hybrid steel/FRP composites. The findings emphasize the effectiveness of the applied retrofitting techniques in restoring the lost capacity due to the cutting of post-construction openings in deep beams.
