Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
MHD stability and disruptions in the SPARC tokamak
by
Granetz, R.
, Paz-Soldan, C.
, La Haye, R. J.
, Sweeney, R.
, Irby, J.
, Greenwald, M.
, Rea, C.
, Izzo, V. A.
, Hesslow, L.
, Zhu, J.
, Garnier, D. T.
, Doody, J.
, Montes, K.
, Logan, N. C.
, Fülöp, T.
, Vallhagen, O.
, Creely, A. J.
, Tinguely, R. A.
in
70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY
/ Coils
/ Computer simulation
/ Design
/ Disruption
/ Eddy currents
/ fusion plasma
/ Investigations
/ Modelling
/ Plasma
/ Plasma currents
/ plasma instabilities
/ Plasma physics
/ Power plants
/ runaway electrons
/ Safety factors
/ Status of the SPARC Physics Basis
/ Tearing
/ Tearing modes (plasmas)
/ Tokamak devices
2020
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
MHD stability and disruptions in the SPARC tokamak
by
Granetz, R.
, Paz-Soldan, C.
, La Haye, R. J.
, Sweeney, R.
, Irby, J.
, Greenwald, M.
, Rea, C.
, Izzo, V. A.
, Hesslow, L.
, Zhu, J.
, Garnier, D. T.
, Doody, J.
, Montes, K.
, Logan, N. C.
, Fülöp, T.
, Vallhagen, O.
, Creely, A. J.
, Tinguely, R. A.
in
70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY
/ Coils
/ Computer simulation
/ Design
/ Disruption
/ Eddy currents
/ fusion plasma
/ Investigations
/ Modelling
/ Plasma
/ Plasma currents
/ plasma instabilities
/ Plasma physics
/ Power plants
/ runaway electrons
/ Safety factors
/ Status of the SPARC Physics Basis
/ Tearing
/ Tearing modes (plasmas)
/ Tokamak devices
2020
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
MHD stability and disruptions in the SPARC tokamak
by
Granetz, R.
, Paz-Soldan, C.
, La Haye, R. J.
, Sweeney, R.
, Irby, J.
, Greenwald, M.
, Rea, C.
, Izzo, V. A.
, Hesslow, L.
, Zhu, J.
, Garnier, D. T.
, Doody, J.
, Montes, K.
, Logan, N. C.
, Fülöp, T.
, Vallhagen, O.
, Creely, A. J.
, Tinguely, R. A.
in
70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY
/ Coils
/ Computer simulation
/ Design
/ Disruption
/ Eddy currents
/ fusion plasma
/ Investigations
/ Modelling
/ Plasma
/ Plasma currents
/ plasma instabilities
/ Plasma physics
/ Power plants
/ runaway electrons
/ Safety factors
/ Status of the SPARC Physics Basis
/ Tearing
/ Tearing modes (plasmas)
/ Tokamak devices
2020
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
MHD stability and disruptions in the SPARC tokamak
2020
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
SPARC is being designed to operate with a normalized beta of $\\beta _N=1.0$, a normalized density of $n_G=0.37$ and a safety factor of $q_{95}\\approx 3.4$, providing a comfortable margin to their respective disruption limits. Further, a low beta poloidal $\\beta _p=0.19$ at the safety factor $q=2$ surface reduces the drive for neoclassical tearing modes, which together with a frozen-in classically stable current profile might allow access to a robustly tearing-free operating space. Although the inherent stability is expected to reduce the frequency of disruptions, the disruption loading is comparable to and in some cases higher than that of ITER. The machine is being designed to withstand the predicted unmitigated axisymmetric halo current forces up to 50 MN and similarly large loads from eddy currents forced to flow poloidally in the vacuum vessel. Runaway electron (RE) simulations using GO+CODE show high flattop-to-RE current conversions in the absence of seed losses, although NIMROD modelling predicts losses of ${\\sim }80$ %; self-consistent modelling is ongoing. A passive RE mitigation coil designed to drive stochastic RE losses is being considered and COMSOL modelling predicts peak normalized fields at the plasma of order $10^{-2}$ that rises linearly with a change in the plasma current. Massive material injection is planned to reduce the disruption loading. A data-driven approach to predict an oncoming disruption and trigger mitigation is discussed.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
MBRLCatalogueRelatedBooks
Related Items
Related Items
We currently cannot retrieve any items related to this title. Kindly check back at a later time.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.