Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Evaluation of ChatGPT pathology knowledge using board-style questions
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Evaluation of ChatGPT pathology knowledge using board-style questions
Do you wish to request the book?
Evaluation of ChatGPT pathology knowledge using board-style questions
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Evaluation of ChatGPT pathology knowledge using board-style questions
2024
Overview
Abstract
Objectives
ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence chatbot developed by OpenAI. Its extensive knowledge and unique interactive capabilities enable its use in various innovative ways in the medical field, such as writing clinical notes and simplifying radiology reports. Through this study, we aimed to analyze the pathology knowledge of ChatGPT to advocate its role in transforming pathology education.
Methods
The American Society for Clinical Pathology Resident Question Bank 2022 was used to test ChatGPT, version 4. Practice tests were created in each subcategory and answered based on the input that ChatGPT provided. Questions that required interpretation of images were excluded. We analyzed ChatGPT performance and compared it with average peer performance.
Results
The overall performance of ChatGPT was 56.98%, lower than that of the average peer performance of 62.81%. ChatGPT performed better on clinical pathology (60.42%) than on anatomic pathology (54.94%). Furthermore, its performance was better on easy questions (68.47%) than on intermediate (52.88%) and difficult questions (37.21%).
Conclusions
ChatGPT has the potential to be a valuable resource in pathology education if trained on a larger, specialized medical data set. Those relying on it (in its current form) solely for the purpose of pathology training should be cautious.
Publisher
Oxford University Press
