Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy in children: a multicentric international comparative study between lateral versus prone approach
by
Yamataka, Atsuyuki
, Caione, Paolo
, Chiarenza, Fabio
, Borzi, Peter
, Miyano, Go
, Mushtaq, Imran
, Esposito, Ciro
, Escolino, Maria
, Riccipetitoni, Giovanna
in
Surgery
2019
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy in children: a multicentric international comparative study between lateral versus prone approach
by
Yamataka, Atsuyuki
, Caione, Paolo
, Chiarenza, Fabio
, Borzi, Peter
, Miyano, Go
, Mushtaq, Imran
, Esposito, Ciro
, Escolino, Maria
, Riccipetitoni, Giovanna
in
Surgery
2019
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy in children: a multicentric international comparative study between lateral versus prone approach
by
Yamataka, Atsuyuki
, Caione, Paolo
, Chiarenza, Fabio
, Borzi, Peter
, Miyano, Go
, Mushtaq, Imran
, Esposito, Ciro
, Escolino, Maria
, Riccipetitoni, Giovanna
in
Surgery
2019
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy in children: a multicentric international comparative study between lateral versus prone approach
Journal Article
Retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy in children: a multicentric international comparative study between lateral versus prone approach
2019
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
BackgroundVery limited informations are currently available about the best approach to perform retroperitoneoscopic surgery. This multicentric international study aimed to compare the outcome of lateral versus prone approach for retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy (RPN) in children.MethodsThe records of 164 patients underwent RPN in 7 international centers of pediatric surgery over the last 5 years were retrospectively reviewed. Sixty-one patients (42 girls and 19 boys, average age 3.8 years) were operated using lateral approach (G1), whereas 103 patients (66 girls and 37 boys, average age 3.0 years) underwent prone RPN (G2). The two groups were compared in regard to operative time, postoperative outcome, postoperative complications, and re-operations.ResultsThe average operative time was significantly shorter in G2 (99 min) compared to G1 (160 min) (p = 0.001). Only 2 lateral RPN required conversion to open surgery. There was no significant difference between the two groups as for intraoperative complications (G1:2/61, 3.3%; G2:6/103, 5.8%; p = 0.48), postoperative complications (G1:9/61, 14.7%; G2:17/103, 16.5%; p = 0.80), and re-operations (G1:2/61, 3.3%; G2:4/103, 3.8%; p = 0.85). Regarding postoperative complications, the incidence of symptomatic residual distal ureteric stumps (RDUS) was significantly higher in G2 (7/103, 6.8%) compared to G1 (1/61, 1.6%) (p = 0.001). Most re-operations (4/6, 66.6%) were performed to remove a RDUS .ConclusionsBoth lateral and prone approach are feasible and reasonably safe to perform RPN in children but the superiority of one approach over another is not still confirmed. Although prone technique resulted faster compared to lateral approach, the choice of the technique remains dependent on the surgeon’s personal preference and experience. Our results would suggest that the lateral approach should be preferred to the prone technique when a longer ureterectomy is required, for example in cases of vesico-ureteral reflux into the affected kidney moiety, in order to avoid to leave a long ureteric stump that could become symptomatic and require a re-intervention.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.