Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The limits of decision and choice
by
Abend, Gabriel
in
Concepts
/ Decision making
/ Ethics
/ Logic
/ Philosophy of the Social Sciences
/ Risk
/ Scientific knowledge
/ Scientists
/ Social aspects
/ Social Sciences
/ Social scientists
/ Social theories
/ Sociology
2018
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
The limits of decision and choice
by
Abend, Gabriel
in
Concepts
/ Decision making
/ Ethics
/ Logic
/ Philosophy of the Social Sciences
/ Risk
/ Scientific knowledge
/ Scientists
/ Social aspects
/ Social Sciences
/ Social scientists
/ Social theories
/ Sociology
2018
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
The limits of decision and choice
2018
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Concepts of decision, choice, decision-maker, and decision-making are common practical tools in both social science and natural science, on which scientific knowledge, policy implications, and moral recommendations are based. In this article I address three questions. First, I look into how present-day social scientists and natural scientists use decision/choice concepts. What are they used for? Second, scientists may differ in the application of decision/choice to X, and they may explicitly disagree about the applicability of decision/choice to X. Where exactly do these disagreements lie? Third, I ask how scientists should use decision/choice concepts. What are they correctly and incorrectly used for? I argue that scientists must responsibly attend to a methodological demand: you have to have a principled, non-ad hoc, well-argued-for way of telling where decision/choice applicability ends. Thus, I aim to minimize the risk of conceptual stretching and foster responsible conceptual practices in a large body of scientific work.
Publisher
Springer,Springer Netherlands,Springer Nature B.V
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.