MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Decreasing the Local Anesthetic Volume From 20 to 10 mL for Ultrasound-Guided Interscalene Block at the Cricoid Level Does Not Reduce the Incidence of Hemidiaphragmatic Paresis
Decreasing the Local Anesthetic Volume From 20 to 10 mL for Ultrasound-Guided Interscalene Block at the Cricoid Level Does Not Reduce the Incidence of Hemidiaphragmatic Paresis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Decreasing the Local Anesthetic Volume From 20 to 10 mL for Ultrasound-Guided Interscalene Block at the Cricoid Level Does Not Reduce the Incidence of Hemidiaphragmatic Paresis
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Decreasing the Local Anesthetic Volume From 20 to 10 mL for Ultrasound-Guided Interscalene Block at the Cricoid Level Does Not Reduce the Incidence of Hemidiaphragmatic Paresis
Decreasing the Local Anesthetic Volume From 20 to 10 mL for Ultrasound-Guided Interscalene Block at the Cricoid Level Does Not Reduce the Incidence of Hemidiaphragmatic Paresis

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Decreasing the Local Anesthetic Volume From 20 to 10 mL for Ultrasound-Guided Interscalene Block at the Cricoid Level Does Not Reduce the Incidence of Hemidiaphragmatic Paresis
Decreasing the Local Anesthetic Volume From 20 to 10 mL for Ultrasound-Guided Interscalene Block at the Cricoid Level Does Not Reduce the Incidence of Hemidiaphragmatic Paresis
Journal Article

Decreasing the Local Anesthetic Volume From 20 to 10 mL for Ultrasound-Guided Interscalene Block at the Cricoid Level Does Not Reduce the Incidence of Hemidiaphragmatic Paresis

2011
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Background and Objectives:This prospective, randomized, double-blind study was designed to determine whether reduction in volume from 20 to 10 mL of ropivacaine 0.5% for ultrasound-guided interscalene block might decrease the incidence of diaphragmatic paresis and preserve pulmonary function.Method:Thirty patients scheduled for arthroscopic shoulder surgery were randomized to receive either 10 or 20 mL of ropivacaine 0.5% for interscalene block at the level of the cricoid cartilage. General anesthesia was administered for surgery, and the surgeon infiltrated lidocaine at the port sites. Hemidiaphragmatic excursion and pulmonary function tests were measured before block, 15 mins after block, and at the time of discharge from recovery room. Onset and duration of sensory dermatomal spread, motor block, pain scores, and analgesic consumption were recorded.Results:Hemidiaphragmatic paresis occurred 15 mins after block performance in 14 of 15 patients in each group. At postanesthesia care unit discharge, 13 of 15 patients in each group continued to demonstrate hemidiaphragmatic paresis. Significant reduction of spirometric values (forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume at 1 sec, and peak expiratory flow) occurred to a similar degree in both groups after block. Sensory dermatomal spread, motor block, pain scores, and analgesic consumption were not significantly different between groups.Conclusions:Decreasing the volume for interscalene block from 20 to 10 mL did not reduce the incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paresis or impairment in pulmonary function, which persisted at discharge from recovery room. No significant differences in quality or duration of analgesia were observed.
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group LTD