MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
The effectiveness of two different sub-bandage pressure values on healing and quality of life outcomes for patients with venous leg ulcers
The effectiveness of two different sub-bandage pressure values on healing and quality of life outcomes for patients with venous leg ulcers
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The effectiveness of two different sub-bandage pressure values on healing and quality of life outcomes for patients with venous leg ulcers
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
The effectiveness of two different sub-bandage pressure values on healing and quality of life outcomes for patients with venous leg ulcers
The effectiveness of two different sub-bandage pressure values on healing and quality of life outcomes for patients with venous leg ulcers

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
The effectiveness of two different sub-bandage pressure values on healing and quality of life outcomes for patients with venous leg ulcers
The effectiveness of two different sub-bandage pressure values on healing and quality of life outcomes for patients with venous leg ulcers
Journal Article

The effectiveness of two different sub-bandage pressure values on healing and quality of life outcomes for patients with venous leg ulcers

2023
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Venous ulcers account for over 80% of chronic wounds in the lower extremities. Venous ulcers lead to a significant decrease in the patients' quality of life. To compare the effectiveness of two different sub-bandage pressure values on healing and quality of life outcomes. The study included 116 outpatients with venous leg ulcers (VLUs), one group with a moderate compression pressure of 35-40 mm Hg and the second with a high pressure > 45 mm Hg. The Kaplan-Meier curve and log rank test were used to estimate healing by type of compression. Quality of life measures included: Quality of Life Index (QL), Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Patients were followed for 24 weeks. Kaplan-Maier analysis showed that a high pressure leads to a higher proportion of healed VLUs, compared to the moderate pressure ( = 0.011). QL, GDS and NPRS at the beginning were equalized between the groups. In patients with a high compression, there was a statistically significant increase in QL ( = 0.005), decrease in GDS ( = 0.040) and NPRS ( = 0.002) during 24 weeks. In patients with moderate compressions there was a statistically significant increase in QL ( = 0.013). Patients who received high pressure, healed faster. When a high pressure was applied, there was a statistically significant increase in QL, decrease in GDS and NPRS compared to the group of patients to whom the moderate pressure was applied.
Publisher
Termedia Publishing House