Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Social Paleontology on Twitter: A Case Study of Topic Archetypes, Network Composition, and Structure
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Social Paleontology on Twitter: A Case Study of Topic Archetypes, Network Composition, and Structure
Do you wish to request the book?
Social Paleontology on Twitter: A Case Study of Topic Archetypes, Network Composition, and Structure
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Social Paleontology on Twitter: A Case Study of Topic Archetypes, Network Composition, and Structure
2022
Overview
Social paleontology is a burgeoning field of research that seeks to understand the natural world through the collection, preparation, curation, and study of fossils via online communities. Such a community represents an ideal case for examining scientific practice as the expression of conversation topics in relation to the people who participate. Using Communities of Practice as a theoretical framework, we consider interactions within an egocentric Twitter network over a 397-day period to identify topic archetypes within the community, examine how such topic archetypes act as expressions of behavior that are indicative of community processes, and provide empirical evidence for detecting and indicating the health of an online community. Data were collected continuously and analyzed with a combination of topic modeling and social network analysis. Four unique archetypes were characterized based on the level of activity and longevity of interest. Participants for each were diverse, but not different. Structural differences in each network were noted with high levels of inter-group information flow within certain archetypes. Archetypes were interpreted using the life cycle states for Communities of Practice; sustained conversations and piques of interest indicate healthy online communities. These findings can inform efforts to design, implement, and research online, scientific communities.
Publisher
SAGE Publications,Sage Publications Ltd,SAGE Publishing
