Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Characterization of the Physical Image Quality of a Clinical Photon-Counting Computed Tomography Scanner Across Multiple Acquisition and Reconstruction Settings
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Characterization of the Physical Image Quality of a Clinical Photon-Counting Computed Tomography Scanner Across Multiple Acquisition and Reconstruction Settings
Do you wish to request the book?
Characterization of the Physical Image Quality of a Clinical Photon-Counting Computed Tomography Scanner Across Multiple Acquisition and Reconstruction Settings
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Characterization of the Physical Image Quality of a Clinical Photon-Counting Computed Tomography Scanner Across Multiple Acquisition and Reconstruction Settings
2026
Overview
This phantom study presents a thorough characterization of the physical image quality of a clinical whole-body photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) scanner. Multiple quality metrics—noise, noise power spectrum (NPS), task transfer function (TTF), and detectability index (d′)—were analyzed across a range of reconstruction algorithms (filtered back projection, FBP, and Quantum Iterative Reconstruction, QIR, with strength levels Q1–Q4), and varying reconstruction kernels (Br40/Br60/Br76/Br98). Both standard (STD, 0.4 mm slice thickness) and high-resolution (HR, 0.2 mm slice thickness) reconstruction modes were assessed. QIR significantly reduced image noise (60–95%) compared to FBP, particularly with sharper kernels. Spatial resolution improved with increasing QIR strength level for smoother kernels and was further enhanced using HR mode with sharp kernels. HR mode exhibited better noise performance than STD with sharper reconstructions, due to the small pixel effect. While STD mode showed higher d′ values for larger objects, HR mode outperformed it for smaller objects and sharper kernels. Compared to a conventional energy-integrating computed tomography system, the PCCT scanner showed superior d′ values under similar settings. Overall, this study highlights the complex interplay between acquisition and reconstruction parameters on image quality, confirms the potential of PCCT technology, and underscores the need for further clinical validation.
Publisher
MDPI AG
Subject
