Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The \Antidirector Rights Index\ Revisited
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The \Antidirector Rights Index\ Revisited
Do you wish to request the book?
The \Antidirector Rights Index\ Revisited
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
The \Antidirector Rights Index\ Revisited
2010
Overview
The \"antidirector rights index\" has been used as a measure of shareholder protection in over a hundred articles since it was introduced by La Porta et al. (\" Law and Finance.\" 1998, Journal of Political Economy 106: 1113-55). A thorough reexamination of the legal data, however, leads to corrections for thirty-three of the forty-six countries analyzed. The correlation between corrected and original values is only 0.53. Consequently, many empirical results established using the original index may not be replicable with corrected values. In particular, the corrected index fails to support three widely influential claims: that shareholder protection is higher in common than in civil law countries; that shareholder protection predicts stock market size or ownership dispersion; and that weak corporate governance explains the extent of exchange rate depreciation during the Asian financial crisis of 1997-1998.
