Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Open and closed economies as possible alternative strategies to resource heterogeneity in ants
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Open and closed economies as possible alternative strategies to resource heterogeneity in ants
Do you wish to request the book?
Open and closed economies as possible alternative strategies to resource heterogeneity in ants
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Open and closed economies as possible alternative strategies to resource heterogeneity in ants
2025
Overview
Ant colonies have either a single nest (monodomy) or multiple nests (polydomy). A challenge is to explain their adaptive significance, specifying costs and benefits of each colony type. An explanation for ant polydomy is adaptation to spatially heterogeneous environments. With polydomy a colony can exchange complementary nutrition among nests within the entire colony occupying a wide territory. We tested this resource redistribution hypothesis using two closely related species, i.e. the polydomous ant Pheidole megacephala and the monodomous ant Pheidole noda. We put each colony in an artificially polydomous setting with two nests connected by tubes. We provided liquid food lacking protein to one nest and that lacking carbohydrates to the other nest. P. megacephala almost totally failed to produce brood when the connecting tubes were clipped, whereas it improved reproductive performance when the tubes were open. In marked contrast, P. noda managed to maintain high performance for a long period even when only nutritionally biased food was provided, most likely by relying on stored provisions that compensated for the missing nutrients. Based on these data, we propose the hypothesis that ant polydomy is an open economic strategy to counter heterogeneity in resource distribution ‘spatially’ by trading between nests and extending the resource searching area, whereas monodomy may be a closed economic strategy to cope with resource heterogeneity ‘temporally’ by withstanding food-depressed periods with stored nutrition and by efficient utilization of frugal diets. More empirical data in other ant taxa are necessary to test generality of this idea.
Publisher
The Company of Biologists
Subject
