Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
A Privacy-Preserving Key Management Scheme with Support for Sybil Attack Detection in VANETs
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
A Privacy-Preserving Key Management Scheme with Support for Sybil Attack Detection in VANETs
Do you wish to request the book?
A Privacy-Preserving Key Management Scheme with Support for Sybil Attack Detection in VANETs
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
A Privacy-Preserving Key Management Scheme with Support for Sybil Attack Detection in VANETs
2021
Overview
Vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) face two important and conflicting challenges with regards to security: preserve the privacy of vehicles in order to prevent malicious entities from tracking users and detect and remove bad actors that attempt to game the system for their own advantage. In particular, detecting Sybil attacks, in which one node attempts to appear as many, seemingly conflicts with the goal of privacy preservation, and existing schemes fail on either one or both accounts. To fill this gap, we present a hierarchical key management system which uses short group signatures to preserve member privacy at lower levels while allowing mid-level nodes to detect Sybil attacks and highly trusted nodes at the top of the hierarchy to completely reveal the real identities of malicious nodes in order to prevent them from rejoining the system and for use by legal authorities. In addition, we present an argument for relaxing the requirement of backward secrecy in VANET groups in the case when no malicious activity has been detected.
Publisher
MDPI,MDPI AG
Subject
