Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Low-dose dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging by CZT-SPECT in the identification of obstructive coronary artery disease
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Low-dose dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging by CZT-SPECT in the identification of obstructive coronary artery disease
Do you wish to request the book?
Low-dose dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging by CZT-SPECT in the identification of obstructive coronary artery disease
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Low-dose dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging by CZT-SPECT in the identification of obstructive coronary artery disease
2020
Overview
BackgroundWe measured myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) by a dynamic low-dose CZT-SPECT protocol in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD) and investigated the capability of dynamic data in predicting obstructive CAD. A total of 173 patients with suspected or known CAD underwent dynamic CZT-SPECT after the injection of 155 MBq and 370 MBq of 99mTc-sestamibi for rest and stress imaging, respectively. Standard rest and stress imaging were performed at the end of each dynamic scan. A total perfusion defect (TPD) < 5% were considered normal. Obstructive CAD was defined as ≥ 70% stenosis at coronary angiography.ResultsGlobal MPR was lower (p < 0.05) in patients with abnormal compared with those with normal MPI (2.40 ± 0.7 vs. 2.70 ± 0.8). A weak, albeit significant correlation between TPD and MPR (r = − 0.179, p < 0.05) was found. In 91 patients with available angiographic data, hyperemic MBF (2.59 ± 1.2 vs. 3.24 ± 1.1 ml/min/g) and MPR (1.96 ± 0.7 vs. 2.74 ± 0.9) were lower (both p < 0.05) in patients with obstructive CAD (n = 21) compared with those without (n = 70). At univariable analysis, TPD, hyperemic MBF, and MPR were significant predictors of obstructive CAD, whereas only MPR was independent predictor at multivariable analysis (p < 0.05). At per vessels analysis, regional hyperemic MBF (2.59 ± 1.2 vs. 3.24 ± 1.1 ml/min/g) and regional MPR (1.96 ± 0.7 vs. 2.74 ± 0.9) were lower in the 31 vessels with obstructive CAD compared with 242 vessels without (both p < 0.05).ConclusionsIn patients with suspected or known CAD, MPR assessed by low-dose dynamic CZT-SPECT showed a good correlation with myocardial perfusion imaging findings and it could be useful to predict obstructive CAD.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
