Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Reducing Aerodynamic Interference Through Layout Optimization of Symmetrically Cambered Wingsails: A Comparative Study of In-Line and Parallel Configurations
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Reducing Aerodynamic Interference Through Layout Optimization of Symmetrically Cambered Wingsails: A Comparative Study of In-Line and Parallel Configurations
Do you wish to request the book?
Reducing Aerodynamic Interference Through Layout Optimization of Symmetrically Cambered Wingsails: A Comparative Study of In-Line and Parallel Configurations
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Reducing Aerodynamic Interference Through Layout Optimization of Symmetrically Cambered Wingsails: A Comparative Study of In-Line and Parallel Configurations
2025
Overview
Rigid wingsails are increasingly adopted for wind-assisted ship propulsion, with Symmetrically Cambered (SC) profiles identified as highly efficient for thrust generation. This study investigates installation layouts for multiple SC wingsails, focusing on aerodynamic interference that limits their performance. A fast 2D potential-flow panel method is employed and benchmarked against wind tunnel and 3D IDDES data. Two representative layouts are analyzed: triple-in-line (TL) and quad-in-parallel (QP). Layout optimization is performed using a genetic algorithm with distances between sails as design variables, constrained by the total installation span, at apparent wind angles (AWAs) of 60°, 90°, and 120°. Results show that thrust generation decreases progressively from upstream to downstream sails due to interference effects, with penalties of about 4–6% in the TL and up to 28% in the QP layout. The optimization improves performance only for the TL layout at 60°, while the QP layout shows negligible gains. Analysis of pressure distributions confirms that downstream sails suffer from reduced suction on the leading edge caused by upstream wakes. Overall, the TL layout demonstrates significantly higher aerodynamic reliability than the QP layout. These findings provide new insights into multi-sail configurations and highlight the importance of layout optimization in maximizing thrust efficiency.
