Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Does spelling instruction make students better spellers, readers, and writers? A meta-analytic review
by
Santangelo, Tanya
, Graham, Steve
in
Corpus analysis
/ Correlation
/ Education
/ Effect Size
/ Elementary Education
/ Elementary School Students
/ Experiments
/ High School Students
/ Instructional Effectiveness
/ Kindergarten
/ Language and Literature
/ Linguistics
/ Literacy
/ Literacy skills
/ Literature Reviews
/ Meta Analysis
/ Middle School Students
/ Native Language Instruction
/ Neurology
/ Phonological Awareness
/ Phonology
/ Psycholinguistics
/ Quasi-experimental methods
/ Quasiexperimental Design
/ Question answer sequences
/ Reading ability
/ Reading Acquisition
/ Reading Instruction
/ Reading Skills
/ Secondary school students
/ Skill Development
/ Skills
/ Social Sciences
/ Spelling
/ Spelling Instruction
/ Students
/ Teaching
/ Teaching Methods
/ Writing
/ Writing Acquisition
/ Writing instruction
/ Writing Skills
/ Written Language Instruction
2014
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Does spelling instruction make students better spellers, readers, and writers? A meta-analytic review
by
Santangelo, Tanya
, Graham, Steve
in
Corpus analysis
/ Correlation
/ Education
/ Effect Size
/ Elementary Education
/ Elementary School Students
/ Experiments
/ High School Students
/ Instructional Effectiveness
/ Kindergarten
/ Language and Literature
/ Linguistics
/ Literacy
/ Literacy skills
/ Literature Reviews
/ Meta Analysis
/ Middle School Students
/ Native Language Instruction
/ Neurology
/ Phonological Awareness
/ Phonology
/ Psycholinguistics
/ Quasi-experimental methods
/ Quasiexperimental Design
/ Question answer sequences
/ Reading ability
/ Reading Acquisition
/ Reading Instruction
/ Reading Skills
/ Secondary school students
/ Skill Development
/ Skills
/ Social Sciences
/ Spelling
/ Spelling Instruction
/ Students
/ Teaching
/ Teaching Methods
/ Writing
/ Writing Acquisition
/ Writing instruction
/ Writing Skills
/ Written Language Instruction
2014
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Does spelling instruction make students better spellers, readers, and writers? A meta-analytic review
by
Santangelo, Tanya
, Graham, Steve
in
Corpus analysis
/ Correlation
/ Education
/ Effect Size
/ Elementary Education
/ Elementary School Students
/ Experiments
/ High School Students
/ Instructional Effectiveness
/ Kindergarten
/ Language and Literature
/ Linguistics
/ Literacy
/ Literacy skills
/ Literature Reviews
/ Meta Analysis
/ Middle School Students
/ Native Language Instruction
/ Neurology
/ Phonological Awareness
/ Phonology
/ Psycholinguistics
/ Quasi-experimental methods
/ Quasiexperimental Design
/ Question answer sequences
/ Reading ability
/ Reading Acquisition
/ Reading Instruction
/ Reading Skills
/ Secondary school students
/ Skill Development
/ Skills
/ Social Sciences
/ Spelling
/ Spelling Instruction
/ Students
/ Teaching
/ Teaching Methods
/ Writing
/ Writing Acquisition
/ Writing instruction
/ Writing Skills
/ Written Language Instruction
2014
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Does spelling instruction make students better spellers, readers, and writers? A meta-analytic review
Journal Article
Does spelling instruction make students better spellers, readers, and writers? A meta-analytic review
2014
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Despite the importance of spelling for both writing and reading, there is considerable disagreement regarding how spelling skills are best acquired. During this and virtually all of the last century, some scholars have argued that spelling should not be directly or formally taught as such instruction is not effective or efficient. We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of experimental and quasi-experimental studies to address these claims. The corpus of 53 studies in this review included 6,037 students in kindergarten through 12th grade and yielded 58 effect sizes (ESs) that were used to answer eight research questions concerning the impact of formally teaching spelling on spelling, phonological awareness, reading, and writing performance. An average weighted ES was calculated for each question and the quality of included studies was systematically evaluated. Results provided strong and consistent support for teaching spelling, as it improved spelling performance when compared to no/unrelated instruction (ES = 0.54) or informal/incidental approaches to improving spelling performance (ES = 0.43). Increasing the amount of formal spelling instruction also proved beneficial (ES = 0.70). Gains in spelling were maintained over time (ES = 0.53) and generalized to spelling when writing (ES = 0.94). Improvements in phonological awareness (ES = 0.51) and reading skills (ES = 0.44) were also found. The positive outcomes associated with formal spelling instruction were generally consistent, regardless of students’ grade level or literacy skills.
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.