Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The intracranial pressure–volume relationship following decompressive hinge craniotomy compared to decompressive craniectomy—a human cadaver study
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The intracranial pressure–volume relationship following decompressive hinge craniotomy compared to decompressive craniectomy—a human cadaver study
Do you wish to request the book?
The intracranial pressure–volume relationship following decompressive hinge craniotomy compared to decompressive craniectomy—a human cadaver study
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
The intracranial pressure–volume relationship following decompressive hinge craniotomy compared to decompressive craniectomy—a human cadaver study
2023
Overview
Objective
Decompressive hinge craniotomy (DHC) is an alternative treatment option to decompressive craniectomy (DC) for elevated intracranial pressure (ICP). The aim of this study was to characterize the difference in pressure–volume relationship between DHC and DC.
Methods
We compared the intracranial pressure–volume relationship in a human cadaver model following either DHC, DC, or fixing of the bone plate by titanium clamps. We inserted an intracranial expandable device in two human cadaver specimens, performed either DHC, DC, or bone plate fixation, and gradually increased the intracranial volume while measuring ICP. Following DHC, we also performed CT-scans at pre-defined intervals.
Results
Before ICP exceeded a threshold of 20 mmHg, a fixed bone plate tolerated an increase of 130 ml of intracranial volume, while DHC and DC allowed an increase of 190 ml and 290 ml, respectively. CT-derived calculations following DHC determined that the increase in intracranial volume at ICP 22 mmHg was 65 ml, the maximal increase of intracranial volume was 84 ml, the maximal bone displacement was 21 mm, and the bone plate volume to be 82 ml. Manual stress test of the hinged bone plate did not allow misalignment or intracranial displacement of the bone plate.
Conclusion
DHC increases the intracranial volume by up to 84 ml and allows for approximately 60 ml increase of intracranial volume before ICP exceeds 20 mmHg. This indicates, when comparing with results from previous studies of herniation volumes, that DHC will be sufficient in many patients with head injury or cerebral infarction with treatment refractory intracranial hypertension.
Publisher
Springer Vienna,Springer Nature B.V
