Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Common and distinct BOLD correlates of Simon and flanker conflicts which can(not) be reduced to time‐on‐task effects
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Common and distinct BOLD correlates of Simon and flanker conflicts which can(not) be reduced to time‐on‐task effects
Do you wish to request the book?
Common and distinct BOLD correlates of Simon and flanker conflicts which can(not) be reduced to time‐on‐task effects
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Common and distinct BOLD correlates of Simon and flanker conflicts which can(not) be reduced to time‐on‐task effects
2024
Overview
The ability to identify and resolve conflicts between standard, well‐trained behaviors and behaviors required by the current context is an essential feature of cognitive control. To date, no consensus has been reached on the brain mechanisms involved in exerting such control: while some studies identified diverse patterns of activity across different conflicts, other studies reported common resources across conflict tasks or even across simple tasks devoid of the conflict component. The latter reports attributed the entire activity observed in the presence of conflict to longer time spent on the task (i.e., to the so‐called time‐on‐task effects). Here, we used an extended Multi‐Source Interference Task (MSIT) which combines Simon and flanker types of interference to determine shared and conflict‐specific mechanisms of conflict resolution in fMRI and their separability from the time‐on‐task effects. Large portions of the activity in the dorsal attention network and decreases of activity in the default mode network were shared across the tasks and scaled in parallel with increasing reaction times. Importantly, the activity in the sensory and sensorimotor cortices, as well as in the posterior medial frontal cortex (pMFC) – a key region implicated in conflict processing – could not be exhaustively explained by the time‐on‐task effects. Cognitive effort related to selecting appropriate behaviors in a context of interfering (conflicting) information activates common cognitive brain mechanisms (activation of the attention network and deactivation of the default mode network) mostly in a time‐on‐task manner. However, there is also a specific, conflict‐related activation (in pMFC), the intensity of which exceeds estimations based on the time‐on‐task model.
Publisher
John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Subject
We currently cannot retrieve any items related to this title. Kindly check back at a later time.