Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Optimizing Source-Control Systems for Ammonia Mitigation in Swine Manure Pits: Performance Assessment and Modeling
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Optimizing Source-Control Systems for Ammonia Mitigation in Swine Manure Pits: Performance Assessment and Modeling
Do you wish to request the book?
Optimizing Source-Control Systems for Ammonia Mitigation in Swine Manure Pits: Performance Assessment and Modeling
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Optimizing Source-Control Systems for Ammonia Mitigation in Swine Manure Pits: Performance Assessment and Modeling
2025
Overview
Ammonia (NH3) emissions from swine manure pits contribute significantly to odor nuisance, health risks, and secondary PM2.5 formation. This study assessed the pilot-scale performance of three source-control technologies: surface sealing with surfactant-based foam system (FOAM SYSTEM), swine manure wiping and removing system (WIPING SYSTEM), and belt-conveyor-based solid–liquid separator system (BELT SYSTEM). Each technology targets a different pathway in the ammonia generation process. The FOAM SYSTEM suppresses volatilization by forming a foam barrier at the air–liquid interface. The WIPING SYSTEM reduces precursor contact time by periodically removing feces. The BELT SYSTEM separates feces and urine upon excretion, inhibiting enzymatic ammonia formation. Among the individual systems, the BELT SYSTEM achieved the highest ammonia reduction efficiency of 91.7%, followed by the FOAM SYSTEM (73.6%) and WIPING SYSTEM (64.4%). The combined FOAM SYSTEM + BELT SYSTEM yielded the best performance with an ammonia reduction efficiency of 94.4%, showing modest synergy without operational interference. In contrast, the FOAM SYSTEM + WIPING SYSTEM configuration achieved 71.1%, slightly lower than the FOAM SYSTEM alone, likely due to foam disruption. Environmental sensitivity tests revealed that higher temperatures and alkaline pH elevated NH3 emissions, whereas systems that maintained near-neutral pH, like the FOAM SYSTEM, demonstrated greater stability. These findings highlight the importance of integrating physical and source-control mechanisms while considering environmental variability for effective on-farm ammonia mitigation.
Publisher
MDPI AG
