Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Clinical academics’ experiences of REF2021
by
McKinley, Robert
, Davies, Angharad P.
, Katz, David
, Gabbay, Mark
, Strain, W David
in
Clinical academia
/ Higher education
/ Minority & ethnic groups
/ REF
2024
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Clinical academics’ experiences of REF2021
by
McKinley, Robert
, Davies, Angharad P.
, Katz, David
, Gabbay, Mark
, Strain, W David
in
Clinical academia
/ Higher education
/ Minority & ethnic groups
/ REF
2024
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Clinical academics’ experiences of REF2021
2024
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The UK Research Excellence Framework (REF) is an assessment of the quality of research carried out in UK Higher Education Institutions (HEIs), performed in 7-year cycles. The outcome impacts the rankings and funding of UK HEIs, which afford the exercise high priority. Much of what REF measures is known to be biased against academics with protected characteristics: for example, women and ethnic minority researchers are less likely to win grants or be published in prestigious journals. Despite changes to REF since 2014, the risk remains that the process might amplify well-recognised existing disparities. The BMA Women in Academic Medicine and Medical Academic Staff Committee carried out a survey of UK clinical academics’ experiences of REF2021. The data indicated the persistence of activities previously characterised as ‘extremely harmful’ in Research England-commissioned work, affecting up to 10% of clinical academics. While acknowledging the limitations of the data, women appeared to be disproportionately affected.
Publisher
Elsevier Ltd,Royal College of Physicians
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.