MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Severe obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome and erectile dysfunction: a prospective randomised study to compare sildenafil vs. nasal continuous positive airway pressure
Severe obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome and erectile dysfunction: a prospective randomised study to compare sildenafil vs. nasal continuous positive airway pressure
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Severe obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome and erectile dysfunction: a prospective randomised study to compare sildenafil vs. nasal continuous positive airway pressure
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Severe obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome and erectile dysfunction: a prospective randomised study to compare sildenafil vs. nasal continuous positive airway pressure
Severe obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome and erectile dysfunction: a prospective randomised study to compare sildenafil vs. nasal continuous positive airway pressure

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Severe obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome and erectile dysfunction: a prospective randomised study to compare sildenafil vs. nasal continuous positive airway pressure
Severe obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome and erectile dysfunction: a prospective randomised study to compare sildenafil vs. nasal continuous positive airway pressure
Journal Article

Severe obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome and erectile dysfunction: a prospective randomised study to compare sildenafil vs. nasal continuous positive airway pressure

2014
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Summary Background A high incidence of erectile dysfunction (ED) among patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) has been reported, with a strong correlation between obstructive sleep apnoea, ED, and quality of life (QOL), and it has been estimated that 10–60% of patients with OSAS suffer from ED. In this prospective randomised controlled trial, we investigated 82 men with ED consecutively who were referred to the outpatient clinic for sleep disorders and had severe OSAS (AHI> 30 events/h) without any other comorbidities as a possible cause of ED. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of sildenafil vs. continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in men with ED and severe OSAS. Methods Eighty‐two patients were randomised to two main treatment groups: group 1 patients (n = 41) were treated with 100‐mg sildenafil 1 h before sexual intercourse without CPAP, and group 2 patients (n = 41 men) were treated with only nasal CPAP during night time sleep. Both groups were evaluated with the same questionnaires (International Index of Erectile Function‐EF domain; Sex Encounter Profile; Erectile Dysfunction Inventory Treatment Satisfaction) 12 weeks after treatment. Results In patients receiving sildenafil treatment, 58.2% of those who attempted sexual intercourses were successful compared to 30.4% in the CPAP group. The mean number of successful attempts per week was significantly higher in the sildenafil group compared with the CPAP group (2.9 vs. 1.7, respectively; p < 0.0001). The mean IIEF‐EF domain scores were significantly higher in the sildenafil group compared with the CPAP group (p < 0.0001). The overall satisfaction rate was 68% with sildenafil treatment and 29% with CPAP treatment. Conclusions This study confirms that severe OSAS is strongly associated with erectile dysfunction. CPAP and sildenafil (100 mg) are safe and effective therapies for OSAS‐related ED patients. In the present study sildenafil was more effective than CPAP in treating ED associated with OSAS, as indicated by a significantly higher rate of successful attempts at intercourse and higher IIEF‐EF domain scores. Our study, to date, is the only that has investigated sildenafil in patients with severe OSAS.