Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Biopsy remains indispensable for evaluating bone marrow involvement in DLBCL patients despite the use of positron emission tomography
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Biopsy remains indispensable for evaluating bone marrow involvement in DLBCL patients despite the use of positron emission tomography
Do you wish to request the book?
Biopsy remains indispensable for evaluating bone marrow involvement in DLBCL patients despite the use of positron emission tomography
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Biopsy remains indispensable for evaluating bone marrow involvement in DLBCL patients despite the use of positron emission tomography
2021
Overview
Initial staging by positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scanning is recommended for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Whether both PET/CT and bone marrow biopsy (BMB) are required remains unclear. This study examined whether staging by PET/CT is sufficient. Participants with untreated DLBCL assessed using both PET/CT and BMB were included. Patients received independent diagnostic assessments from a radiologist and a hematopathologist. Both hematoxylin–eosin staining and CD20 immunostaining were performed to determine the bone marrow involvement in BMB. A total of 84 patients were included. The number of patients with positive bone marrow involvement identified by PET/CT and BMB was 16 (19%) and 22 (26%), respectively. Eight (10%) patients showed positive results in both tests. When considering BMB as a reference, PET/CT showed 36% sensitivity and 87% specificity, with positive and negative predictive values of 50% and 79%, respectively. BMB-positive patients had shorter progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival than their BMB-negative counterparts. Compared to PET/CT-negative patients, patients with positive results did not show any significant differences in PFS and OS. However, among 16 PET/CT-positive patients, poor PFS and OS were observed among patients who were also BMB positive. BMB remains a mandatory step in staging of untreated DLBCL patients.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
Subject
