Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Ending the Presumption of Reasonableness and Using Data to Reduce Sentencing Disparities
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Ending the Presumption of Reasonableness and Using Data to Reduce Sentencing Disparities
Do you wish to request the book?
Ending the Presumption of Reasonableness and Using Data to Reduce Sentencing Disparities
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Ending the Presumption of Reasonableness and Using Data to Reduce Sentencing Disparities
2025
Overview
The idea that one's punishment should depend on the crime committed rather than which judge happens to do the sentencing strikes most as uncontroversial, if not a requirement for a fair sentencing regime. Forty years ago, the passage of the Sentencing Reform Act promised just that result. Increased data availability allows us to evaluate the project's success. The results are not encouraging.
Publisher
Northwestern University, School of Law
Subject
