Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Distinct approaches (antecolic and retrocolic) according to tumor location in laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for non-ampullary duodenum tumors
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Distinct approaches (antecolic and retrocolic) according to tumor location in laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for non-ampullary duodenum tumors
Do you wish to request the book?
Distinct approaches (antecolic and retrocolic) according to tumor location in laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for non-ampullary duodenum tumors
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Distinct approaches (antecolic and retrocolic) according to tumor location in laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for non-ampullary duodenum tumors
2023
Overview
AimLaparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for early non-ampullary duodenum tumors (D-LECS) is now noted because of its safety and lower invasiveness. Here, we introduce two distinct approaches (antecolic and retrocolic) according to the tumor location during D-LECS.MethodsFrom October 2018 to March 2022, 24 patients (25 lesions) underwent D-LECS. Two (8%), two (8%), 16 (64%), and five (20%) lesions were located in the first portion, in the second portion to Vater’s papilla, around the inferior duodenum flexure, and in the third portion of the duodenum, respectively. The median preoperative tumor diameter was 22.5 mm.ResultsAntecolic and retrocolic approaches were employed in 16 (67%) and 8 (33%) cases, respectively. LECS procedures, such as two-layer suturing after full-thickness dissection and laparoscopic reinforcement by seromuscular suturing after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), were performed in five and 19 cases, respectively. Median operative time and blood loss were 303 min and 5 g, respectively. Intraoperative duodenal perforations occurred in three of 19 cases during ESD; however, they were successfully laparoscopically repaired. Median times until start diet and postoperative hospital stay were 4.5 and 8 days, respectively. Histological examination of the tumors revealed nine adenomas, 12 adenocarcinomas, and four GISTs. Curative resection (R0) was achieved in 21 cases (87.5%). In a comparison of the surgical short outcomes between antecolic and retrocolic approaches, there was no significant difference.ConclusionD-LECS can be a safe and minimally invasive treatment option for non-ampullary early duodenal tumors, and two distinct approaches according to the tumor location are feasible.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
Subject
We currently cannot retrieve any items related to this title. Kindly check back at a later time.