Journal Article

Clinical decision rules in primary care: necessary investments for sustainable healthcare

Oudega, Ruud, Hopstaken, Rogier, Kusters, Ron, Heerink, Jorn S., Koffijberg, Hendrik

2023

Overview

Clinical judgement in primary care is more often decisive than in the hospital. Clinical decision rules (CDRs) can help general practitioners facilitating the work-through of differentials that follows an initial suspicion, resulting in a concrete ‘course of action’: a ‘rule-out’ without further testing, a need for further testing, or a specific treatment. However, in daily primary care, the use of CDRs is limited to only a few isolated rules. In this paper, we aimed to provide insight into the laborious path required to implement a viable CDR. At the same time, we noted that the limited use of CDRs in primary care cannot be explained by implementation barriers alone. Through the case study of the Oudega rule for the exclusion of deep vein thrombosis, we concluded that primary care CDRs come out best if they are tailor-made, taking into consideration the specific context of primary health care. Current CDRs should be evaluated frequently, and future decision rules should anticipate the latest developments such as the use of point-of-care (POC) tests. Hence, such new powerful diagnostic CDRs could improve and expand the possibilities for patient-oriented primary care.

• Publisher: Cambridge University Press
• Subject: Clinical decision making / Clinical Decision Rules / Clinical medicine / Cost control / Decision Support Techniques / Delivery of Health Care / Development / Family physicians / Health Facilities / Humans / Impact analysis / Patient satisfaction / Primary care / Primary Health Care - methods