Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Artificial intelligence system shows performance at the level of uropathologists for the detection and grading of prostate cancer in core needle biopsy: an independent external validation study
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Artificial intelligence system shows performance at the level of uropathologists for the detection and grading of prostate cancer in core needle biopsy: an independent external validation study
Do you wish to request the book?
Artificial intelligence system shows performance at the level of uropathologists for the detection and grading of prostate cancer in core needle biopsy: an independent external validation study
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Artificial intelligence system shows performance at the level of uropathologists for the detection and grading of prostate cancer in core needle biopsy: an independent external validation study
2022
Overview
Accurate diagnosis and grading of needle biopsies are crucial for prostate cancer management. A uropathologist-level artificial intelligence (AI) system could help make unbiased decisions and improve pathologists' efficiency. We previously reported an artificial neural network-based, automated, diagnostic software for prostate biopsy, DeepDx® Prostate (DeepDx). Using an independent external dataset, we aimed to validate the performance of DeepDx at the levels of prostate cancer diagnosis and grading and evaluate its potential value to the general pathologist. A dataset composed of 593 whole-slide images of prostate biopsies (130 normal and 463 adenocarcinomas) was assembled, including their original pathology reports. The Gleason scores (GSs) and grade groups (GGs) determined by three uropathology experts were considered as the reference standard. A general pathologist conducted user validation by scoring the dataset with and without AI assistance. DeepDx was accurate for prostate cancer detection at a similar level to the original pathology report, whereas it was more concordant than the latter with the reference GGs and GSs (kappa/quadratic-weighted kappa = 0.713/0.922 vs. 0.619/0.873 for GGs and 0.654/0.904 vs. 0.576/0.858 for GSs). Notably, it outperformed the original report, especially in the detection of Gleason patterns 4/5, and achieved excellent agreement in quantifying the Gleason pattern 4. When the general pathologist used AI assistance, the concordance of GG between the user and the reference standard increased (kappa/quadratic-weighted kappa, 0.621/0.876 to 0.741/0.925), while the average slide examination time was substantially decreased (55.7 to 36.8 s/case). Overall, DeepDx was capable of making expert-level diagnosis in prostate core biopsies. In addition, its remarkable performance in detecting high-grade Gleason patterns and enhancing the general pathologist's diagnostic performance supports its potential value in routine practice.
