Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis
Do you wish to request the book?
The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis
2023
Overview
Universal Design for Learning (UDL) framework supports students' diversity principles in inclusive education settings. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the effectiveness of UDL principles in educational settings. The inclusion criteria of the systematic search include empirical peer-reviewed research (pre-and post-design) published between 2015 to 2021 in English and Arabic (N = 13). Findings of the systematic review revealed that the identified studies were conducted in six countries, either specific or generic domain-related; targeting K-12 or higher education levels, generally implemented all UDL principles, directed to teachers or students using professional development programmes or school interventions, and mainly used one group quantitative research design. The meta-analysis findings showed that the total effect sizes for the identified studies were 3.56; however, considerable heterogeneity was evident. The meta-analysis results specifically showed statistically significant effect sizes for one group studies, student participants, specific domain, and quantitative research design. Discussion and future directions are presented.
Publisher
Cogent,Taylor & Francis Ltd,Taylor & Francis Group
