Journal Article

Clinical indications for image-guided interventional procedures in the musculoskeletal system: a Delphi-based consensus paper from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR)—part VI, foot and ankle

McNally, Eugene, Albano, Domenico, Beggs, Ian, Obradov, Marina, Martin, Silvia, Melaki, Kalliopi, McCarthy, Catherine, Mascarenhas, Vasco, Messina, Carmelo, Moutinho, Ricardo, Vucetic, Jelena, Tomas, Xavier, Wilson, David, Prada González, Raquel, Mansour, Ramy, Klauser, Andrea, Greenwood, Simon, Aringhieri, Giacomo, del Cura, Jose Luis, Vasilevska Nikodinovska, Violeta, McKean, David, Chianca, Vito, Mauri, Giovanni, Snoj, Žiga, Tagliafico, Alberto Stefano, Mirón Mombiela, Rebeca, Isaac, Amanda, Dalili, Danoob, Drakonaki, Elena, Khanna, Monica, Ivanoski, Slavcho, Olchowy, Cyprian, De Dea, Miriam, Adriaensen, Miraude, Bazzocchi, Alberto, Corazza, Angelo, Orlandi, Davide, Allen, Georgina, Prakash, Mahesh, Sconfienza, Luca Maria, Filippiadis, Dimitrios, Posadzy, Magdalena, Talaska, Alexander, Grainger, Andrew J, Gitto, Salvatore, Zappia, Marcello, Aparisi Gómez, Maria Pilar, Di Pietto, Francesco, Facal de Castro, Fernando, Zaottini, Federico, Alcala-Galiano, Andrea, Gupta, Harun, Rutkauskas, Saulius

2022

Overview

Objectives Clarity regarding accuracy and effectiveness for interventional procedures around the foot and ankle is lacking. Consequently, a board of 53 members of the Ultrasound and Interventional Subcommittees of the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) reviewed the published literature to evaluate the evidence on image-guided musculoskeletal interventional procedures around this anatomical region. Methods We report the results of a Delphi-based consensus of 53 experts from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology who reviewed the published literature for evidence on image-guided interventional procedures offered around foot and ankle in order to derive their clinical indications. Experts drafted a list of statements and graded them according to the Oxford Centre for evidence-based medicine levels of evidence. Consensus was considered strong when > 95% of experts agreed with the statement or broad when > 80% but < 95% agreed. The results of the Delphi-based consensus were used to write the paper that was shared with all panel members for final approval. Results A list of 16 evidence-based statements on clinical indications for image-guided musculoskeletal interventional procedures in the foot and ankle were drafted after a literature review. The highest level of evidence was reported for four statements, all receiving 100% agreement. Conclusion According to this consensus, image-guided interventions should not be considered a first-level approach for treating Achilles tendinopathy, while ultrasonography guidance is strongly recommended to improve the efficacy of interventional procedures for plantar fasciitis and Morton’s neuroma, particularly using platelet-rich plasma and corticosteroids, respectively. Key Points • The expert panel of the ESSR listed 16 evidence-based statements on clinical indications of image-guided musculoskeletal interventional procedures in the foot and ankle. • Strong consensus was obtained for all statements. • The highest level of evidence was reached by four statements concerning the effectiveness of US-guided injections of corticosteroid for Morton’s neuroma and PRP for plantar fasciitis.

• Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg,Springer Nature B.V
• Subject: Achilles Tendon / Ankle / Ankle - diagnostic imaging / Consensus / Corticoids / Corticosteroids / Diagnostic Radiology / Fasciitis / Feet / Humans / Imaging / Internal Medicine / Interventional Radiology / Literature reviews / Medicine / Medicine & Public Health / Musculoskeletal / Musculoskeletal System / Neuroradiology / Plantar fasciitis / Plantar tissues / Radiology / Tendinopathy / Ultrasound