Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Does left ventricular function predict cardiac outcome in Anderson–Fabry disease?
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Does left ventricular function predict cardiac outcome in Anderson–Fabry disease?
Do you wish to request the book?
Does left ventricular function predict cardiac outcome in Anderson–Fabry disease?
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Does left ventricular function predict cardiac outcome in Anderson–Fabry disease?
2021
Overview
In Anderson–Fabry disease (AFD) the impact of left ventricular (LV) function on cardiac outcome is unknown. Noninvasive LV pressure–strain loop analysis is a new echocardiographic method to estimate myocardial work (MW). We aimed to evaluate whether LV function was associated with outcome and whether MW had a prognostic value in AFD. Ninety-six AFD patients (41.8 ± 14.7 years, 43.7% males) with normal LV ejection fraction were retrospectively evaluated. Inclusion criteria were sinus rhythm and ≥ 2-year follow-up. Standard echocardiography measurements, myocardial mechano-energetic efficiency (MEE) index, global longitudinal strain (GLS) and MW were evaluated. Adverse cardiac events were defined as composite of cardiac death, malignant ventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation and severe heart failure development. During a median follow-up of 63 months (interquartile range 37–85), 14 events occurred. Patient age, cardiac biomarkers, LV mass index, left atrium volume, E/Ea ratio, LV ejection fraction, MEE index, GLS and all MW indices were significantly related to adverse outcome at univariate analysis. After adjustment for clinical and echocardiographic parameters, which were significant at univariate analysis, GLS and MW resulted independent predictors of adverse events (p < 0.01). By ROC curve analysis, constructive MW ≤ 1513 mmHg% showed the highest sensitivity and specificity in predicting adverse outcome (92.9% and 86.6%, respectively). MW did not improve the predictive value of a model including clinical data, LV diastolic function and GLS. LV function impairment (both systolic and diastolic) is associated with adverse events in AFD. MW does not provide additive information over clinical features and systolic and diastolic function.
Publisher
Springer Nature B.V
Subject
