Journal Article

Clinical utility of the endometrial receptivity analysis in women with prior failed transfers

Chang, Wendy Y, Alexander, Carolyn J, Surrey, Mark W, Danzer, Hal C, Pisarska, Margareta D, Akopians, Alin Lina, Eisman, Laura E, Wang, Erica T, Wertheimer Sahar, Chan, Jessica L, Shahin, Ghadir

2021

Overview

PurposeTo determine the utility of the endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA) in women with prior failed embryo transfers (ET).MethodsThis was a retrospective study of patients who underwent an ERA test with a subsequent frozen ET. Women were classified based on their indication for an ERA test: (1) ≥ 1 prior failed ET (cases), or (2) as a prophylactic measure (controls). A subset analysis of women with ≥ 3 prior failed transfers was performed. Pregnancy outcomes of the subsequent cycle were examined, including conception, clinical pregnancy, and ongoing pregnancy/live birth.ResultsA total of 222 women were included, 131 (59%) women with ≥ 1 prior failed ET and 91 (41%) controls. Among the 131 women with ≥ 1 prior failed ET, 20 women (9%) had ≥ 3 prior failed ETs. The proportion of non-receptive ERA tests in the three groups were the following: 45% (≥ 1 prior failed ET), 40% (≥ 3 prior failed ETs), and 52% (controls). The results did not differ between cases and controls. The pregnancy outcomes did not differ between women with ≥ 1 prior failed ET and controls. In women with ≥ 3 prior failed ETs, there was a lower ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate (28% vs 54%, P = 0.046).ConclusionWomen with ≥ 1 prior failed ET and ≥ 3 prior failed ETs had a similar prevalence of non-receptive endometrium compared to controls. Women with ≥ 3 prior failed ETs had a lower ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate despite a personalized FET, suggesting that there are additional factors in implantation failure beyond an adjustment in progesterone exposure.

• Publisher: Springer Nature B.V
• Subject: Birth rate / Endometrium / Implantation / Pregnancy / Progesterone