Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Interpregnancy interval and adverse pregnancy outcomes among pregnancies following miscarriages or induced abortions in Norway (2008–2016): A cohort study
by
Pereira, Gavin
, Tessema, Gizachew A.
, Dunne, Jennifer
, Magnus, Maria C.
, Håberg, Siri E.
, Regan, Annette K.
in
Abortion, Induced
/ Abortion, Spontaneous - epidemiology
/ Abortion, Spontaneous - etiology
/ Birth Intervals
/ Cohort Studies
/ Diabetes, Gestational
/ Female
/ Fetal Growth Retardation
/ Humans
/ Infant, Newborn
/ Infant, Newborn, Diseases
/ Medicine and Health Sciences
/ Pregnancy
/ Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology
/ Premature Birth - epidemiology
/ Premature Birth - etiology
/ Retrospective Studies
2022
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Interpregnancy interval and adverse pregnancy outcomes among pregnancies following miscarriages or induced abortions in Norway (2008–2016): A cohort study
by
Pereira, Gavin
, Tessema, Gizachew A.
, Dunne, Jennifer
, Magnus, Maria C.
, Håberg, Siri E.
, Regan, Annette K.
in
Abortion, Induced
/ Abortion, Spontaneous - epidemiology
/ Abortion, Spontaneous - etiology
/ Birth Intervals
/ Cohort Studies
/ Diabetes, Gestational
/ Female
/ Fetal Growth Retardation
/ Humans
/ Infant, Newborn
/ Infant, Newborn, Diseases
/ Medicine and Health Sciences
/ Pregnancy
/ Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology
/ Premature Birth - epidemiology
/ Premature Birth - etiology
/ Retrospective Studies
2022
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Interpregnancy interval and adverse pregnancy outcomes among pregnancies following miscarriages or induced abortions in Norway (2008–2016): A cohort study
by
Pereira, Gavin
, Tessema, Gizachew A.
, Dunne, Jennifer
, Magnus, Maria C.
, Håberg, Siri E.
, Regan, Annette K.
in
Abortion, Induced
/ Abortion, Spontaneous - epidemiology
/ Abortion, Spontaneous - etiology
/ Birth Intervals
/ Cohort Studies
/ Diabetes, Gestational
/ Female
/ Fetal Growth Retardation
/ Humans
/ Infant, Newborn
/ Infant, Newborn, Diseases
/ Medicine and Health Sciences
/ Pregnancy
/ Pregnancy Outcome - epidemiology
/ Premature Birth - epidemiology
/ Premature Birth - etiology
/ Retrospective Studies
2022
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Interpregnancy interval and adverse pregnancy outcomes among pregnancies following miscarriages or induced abortions in Norway (2008–2016): A cohort study
Journal Article
Interpregnancy interval and adverse pregnancy outcomes among pregnancies following miscarriages or induced abortions in Norway (2008–2016): A cohort study
2022
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
The World Health Organization recommends to wait at least 6 months after miscarriage and induced abortion before becoming pregnant again to avoid complications in the next pregnancy, although the evidence-based underlying this recommendation is scarce. We aimed to investigate the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes-preterm birth (PTB), spontaneous PTB, small for gestational age (SGA) birth, large for gestational age (LGA) birth, preeclampsia, and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)-by interpregnancy interval (IPI) for births following a previous miscarriage or induced abortion.
We conducted a cohort study using a total of 49,058 births following a previous miscarriage and 23,707 births following a previous induced abortion in Norway between 2008 and 2016. We modeled the relationship between IPI and 6 adverse pregnancy outcomes separately for births after miscarriages and births after induced abortions. We used log-binomial regression to estimate unadjusted and adjusted relative risk (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In the adjusted model, we included maternal age, gravidity, and year of birth measured at the time of the index (after interval) births. In a sensitivity analysis, we further adjusted for smoking during pregnancy and prepregnancy body mass index. Compared to births with an IPI of 6 to 11 months after miscarriages (10.1%), there were lower risks of SGA births among births with an IPI of <3 months (8.6%) (aRR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.79, 0.92, p < 0.01) and 3 to 5 months (9.0%) (aRR 0.90, 95% CI: 0.83, 0.97, p = 0.01). An IPI of <3 months after a miscarriage (3.3%) was also associated with lower risk of GDM (aRR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.96, p = 0.01) as compared to an IPI of 6 to 11 months (4.5%). For births following an induced abortion, an IPI <3 months (11.5%) was associated with a nonsignificant but increased risk of SGA (aRR 1.16, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.36, p = 0.07) as compared to an IPI of 6 to 11 months (10.0%), while the risk of LGA was lower among those with an IPI 3 to 5 months (8.0%) (aRR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.72, 0.98, p = 0.03) compared to an IPI of 6 to 11 months (9.4%). There was no observed association between adverse pregnancy outcomes with an IPI >12 months after either a miscarriage or induced abortion (p > 0.05), with the exception of an increased risk of GDM among women with an IPI of 12 to 17 months (5.8%) (aRR 1.20, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.40, p = 0.02), 18 to 23 months (6.2%) (aRR 1.24, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.50, p = 0.03), and ≥24 months (6.4%) (aRR 1.14, 95% CI: 0.97, 1.34, p = 0.10) compared to an IPI of 6 to 11 months (4.5%) after a miscarriage. Inherent to retrospective registry-based studies, we did not have information on potential confounders such as pregnancy intention and health-seeking bahaviour. Furthermore, we only had information on miscarriages that resulted in contact with the healthcare system.
Our study suggests that conceiving within 3 months after a miscarriage or an induced abortion is not associated with increased risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes. In combination with previous research, these results suggest that women could attempt pregnancy soon after a previous miscarriage or induced abortion without increasing perinatal health risks.
Publisher
Public Library of Science,Public Library of Science (PLoS)
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.