Journal Article

Improving efficiency of a regional stand alone bone bank

Rowan, Clare H., Warnock, Jonathan M., Davidson, Helen, McAlinden, M. Gavan, Millar, Ciara

2016

Overview

The introduction of a stand-alone Bone Bank in our Regional Orthopaedic Hospital has improved the availability of femoral head allograft. Benninger et al. (Bone Joint J 96-B:1307–1311, 2014 ), demonstrated their institutions bank to be cost effective despite a 30 % discard rate for harvested allograft. We sought to audit our own discard rates and subsequent cost-effectiveness of our bone bank. Donor recruitment. Before approaching a potential donor, our establishment’s nurse specialists review their clinical notes and biochemical laboratory results, available on a regional Electronic Care Records. They view femoral head architecture on radiographs against set criteria, Patient Archive and Communication system (SECTRA, Sweden). In total 1383 femoral heads were harvested, 247 were discarded giving an overall rate of 17.9 %. The most common reasons for discard of harvested graft was a positive microbiology/bacteriology result, n = 96 (38.9 %). After a rise in discard rates in 2007, we have steadily reduced our discard rates since 2006/2007 (28.2 %), 2008/2009 (17 %), 2010/2011 (14.8 %), and finally to 10.3 % in 2012/2013. In the current financial year, our cost to harvest, test, store and release a femoral head is £610. With a structured donor recruitment process and unique pre-operative radiographic analysis we have successfully reduced our discard rates bi-annually making our bone bank increasingly cost-effective.

• Publisher: Springer Netherlands,Springer Nature B.V
• Subject: Bacteria - isolation & purification / Biomedical and Life Sciences / Biomedicine / Bone Banks - standards / Bones / Cell Biology / Costs and Cost Analysis / Femur Head - diagnostic imaging / Humans / Life Sciences / Orthopedics / Skin & tissue grafts / Tissue and Organ Harvesting - economics / Tissue Donors / Transplant Surgery