Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Speech communication interference in the robotic operating room
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Speech communication interference in the robotic operating room
Do you wish to request the book?
Speech communication interference in the robotic operating room
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Speech communication interference in the robotic operating room
2024
Overview
Miscommunication in the OR is a threat to patient safety and surgical efficiency. Our objective was to measure the frequency and causes of communication interference between robotic team members. We observed 78 robotic surgeries over 215 h. 65.4% were General Surgery, most commonly cholecystectomy, identifying Speech Communication Interference (SCI) events, defined as “surgery-related group discourse that is disrupted according to the goals of the communication or the physical and situational context of the exchange”. We noted the causes and strategies to correct the miscommunication, near misses, and case delays associated with each SCI event. Post-surgery interviews supported observations and were analyzed thematically. Overall, we observed 687 SCI events (mean 8.8 ± 6.5 per case, 3.2 per hour), ranging from one to 28 per case. 48 (7.0%) occurred during docking and 136 (19.8%) occurred during a critical moment. The most common causes were concurrent tasks (66.1%); loud noises (10.8%) from patient cart, lightbox fan, and suction machine; and overlapping conversations (4.2%). 94.8% resulted in a case delay. These events distracted from monitoring patient safety and resulted in near misses. Mitigating strategies included leaning out of the surgeon console to repeat the message and employing a messenger. These findings help characterize miscommunication in robotic surgery. Possible interventions include microphones and headsets, positioning the surgeon console closer to the bedside, moving loud equipment further away, and upgrading the patient cart speaker.
