MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
Operative versus non-operative treatment of ulnar styloid process base fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Operative versus non-operative treatment of ulnar styloid process base fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Operative versus non-operative treatment of ulnar styloid process base fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Operative versus non-operative treatment of ulnar styloid process base fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Operative versus non-operative treatment of ulnar styloid process base fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Operative versus non-operative treatment of ulnar styloid process base fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Operative versus non-operative treatment of ulnar styloid process base fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Journal Article

Operative versus non-operative treatment of ulnar styloid process base fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2024
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
Purpose Ulnar styloid process (USP) fractures are present in 40–65% of all distal radius fractures (DRFs). USP base fractures can be associated with distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability and ulnar sided wrist pain and are treated by conservative management and surgical fixation, without consensus. This systematic review and meta-analysis compares operative to non-operative treatment of concomitant ulnar styloid base fractures in patients with distal radius fractures. Methods PubMed/Medline/Embase/CENTRAL databases were searched identifying RCTs and comparative observational studies. Effect estimates were extracted and pooled using random effect models to account for heterogeneity across studies. Results were presented as (standardized) mean differences (SMD or MD) or odds ratios (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Results Two RCTs (161 patients) and three observational studies (175 patients) were included. Tension band wiring was used for surgically treated USP fractures. Results were comparable across the different study designs and hence pooled across studies. Non-surgically treated patients had better wrist function at 6 months (SMD 0.57, 95%CI 0.30; 0.90, I 2  = 0%). After 12 months there was no observed difference (MD 2.31, 95%CI −2.57; 7.19, I 2  = 91%). Fewer patients had USP non-unions in the operative group (OR 0.08, 95%CI 0.04; 0.18, I 2  = 0%). More patients suffered complications in the operative group (OR 14.3; 95%CI 1.08; 188, I 2  = 89%). Conclusion Routinely fixating USP base fractures as standard of care is not indicated. Surgery may be considered in selective cases (e.g. persistent DRUJ instability during ballottement test after fixation of the radius).