Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Methane observations from the Greenhouse Gases Observing SATellite: Comparison to ground-based TCCON data and model calculations
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Methane observations from the Greenhouse Gases Observing SATellite: Comparison to ground-based TCCON data and model calculations
Do you wish to request the book?
Methane observations from the Greenhouse Gases Observing SATellite: Comparison to ground-based TCCON data and model calculations
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Methane observations from the Greenhouse Gases Observing SATellite: Comparison to ground-based TCCON data and model calculations
2011
Overview
We report new short‐wave infrared (SWIR) column retrievals of atmospheric methane (XCH4) from the Japanese Greenhouse Gases Observing SATellite (GOSAT) and compare observed spatial and temporal variations with correlative ground‐based measurements from the Total Carbon Column Observing Network (TCCON) and with the global 3‐D GEOS‐Chem chemistry transport model. GOSAT XCH4 retrievals are compared with daily TCCON observations at six sites between April 2009 and July 2010 (Bialystok, Park Falls, Lamont, Orleans, Darwin and Wollongong). GOSAT reproduces the site‐dependent seasonal cycles as observed by TCCON with correlations typically between 0.5 and 0.7 with an estimated single‐sounding precision between 0.4–0.8%. We find a latitudinal‐dependent difference between the XCH4 retrievals from GOSAT and TCCON which ranges from 17.9 ppb at the most northerly site (Bialystok) to −14.6 ppb at the site with the lowest latitude (Darwin). We estimate that the mean smoothing error difference included in the GOSAT to TCCON comparisons can account for 15.7 to 17.4 ppb for the northerly sites and for 1.1 ppb at the lowest latitude site. The GOSAT XCH4 retrievals agree well with the GEOS‐Chem model on annual (August 2009 – July 2010) and monthly timescales, capturing over 80% of the zonal variability. Differences between model and observed XCH4 are found over key source regions such as Southeast Asia and central Africa which will be further investigated using a formal inverse model analysis. Key Points CH4 is now successfully being retrieved from GOSAT satellite Validation against ground‐based data shows good agreement Excellent agreement to model simulations as a first step towards inversions
Publisher
Blackwell Publishing Ltd,American Geophysical Union,John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Subject
