MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail

Do you wish to reserve the book?
A Matter of Perspective: Choosing for Others Differs from Choosing for Yourself in Making Treatment Decisions
A Matter of Perspective: Choosing for Others Differs from Choosing for Yourself in Making Treatment Decisions
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
A Matter of Perspective: Choosing for Others Differs from Choosing for Yourself in Making Treatment Decisions
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Title added to your shelf!
Title added to your shelf!
View what I already have on My Shelf.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to add the title to your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
A Matter of Perspective: Choosing for Others Differs from Choosing for Yourself in Making Treatment Decisions
A Matter of Perspective: Choosing for Others Differs from Choosing for Yourself in Making Treatment Decisions

Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
How would you like to get it?
We have requested the book for you! Sorry the robot delivery is not available at the moment
We have requested the book for you!
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
A Matter of Perspective: Choosing for Others Differs from Choosing for Yourself in Making Treatment Decisions
A Matter of Perspective: Choosing for Others Differs from Choosing for Yourself in Making Treatment Decisions
Journal Article

A Matter of Perspective: Choosing for Others Differs from Choosing for Yourself in Making Treatment Decisions

2006
Request Book From Autostore and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
BACKGROUND: Many people display omission bias in medical decision making, accepting the risk of passive nonintervention rather than actively choosing interventions (such as vaccinations) that result in lower levels of risk. OBJECTIVE: Testing whether people's preferences for active interventions would increase when deciding for others versus for themselves. RESEARCH DESIGN: Survey participants imagined themselves in 1 of 4 roles: patient, physician treating a single patient, medical director creating treatment guidelines, or parent deciding for a child. All read 2 short scenarios about vaccinations for a deadly flu and treatments for a slow‐growing cancer. PARTICIPANTS: Two thousand three hundred and ninety‐nine people drawn from a demographically stratified internet sample. MEASURES: Chosen or recommended treatments. We also measured participants' emotional response to our task. RESULTS: Preferences for risk‐reducing active treatments were significantly stronger for participants imagining themselves as medical professionals than for those imagining themselves as patients (vaccination: 73% [physician] & 63% [medical director] vs 48% [patient], Ps<.001; chemotherapy: 68% & 68% vs 60%, Ps<.012). Similar results were observed for the parental role (vaccination: 57% vs 48%, P=.003; chemotherapy: 72% vs 60%, P<.001). Reported emotional reactions were stronger in the responsible medical professional and parental roles yet were also independently associated with treatment choice, with higher scores associated with reduced omission tendencies (OR=1.15 for both regressions, Ps<.01). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment preferences may be substantially influenced by a decision‐making role. As certain roles appear to reinforce “big picture” thinking about difficult risk tradeoffs, physicians and patients should consider re‐framing treatment decisions to gain new, and hopefully beneficial, perspectives.