Asset Details
MbrlCatalogueTitleDetail
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Dynamic Inconsistency in Food Choice
by
SAMEK, ANYA
, SPRENGER, CHARLES
, SADOFF, SALLY
in
Choices
/ Commitment
/ Experiments
/ field experimentation
/ Food
/ food choices
/ food deserts
/ groceries
/ Grocery industry
/ Inconsistency
/ issues and policy
/ Self control
/ utilities
/ Welfare
2020
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
You are currently in the queue to collect this book. You will be notified once it is your turn to collect the book.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Oops! Something went wrong.
While trying to remove the title from your shelf something went wrong :( Kindly try again later!
Do you wish to request the book?
Dynamic Inconsistency in Food Choice
by
SAMEK, ANYA
, SPRENGER, CHARLES
, SADOFF, SALLY
in
Choices
/ Commitment
/ Experiments
/ field experimentation
/ Food
/ food choices
/ food deserts
/ groceries
/ Grocery industry
/ Inconsistency
/ issues and policy
/ Self control
/ utilities
/ Welfare
2020
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Dynamic Inconsistency in Food Choice
2020
Request Book From Autostore
and Choose the Collection Method
Overview
We conduct field experiments to investigate dynamic inconsistency and commitment demand in food choice. In two home grocery delivery programs, we document substantial dynamic inconsistency between advance and immediate choices. When given the option to commit to their advance choices, around half of subjects take it up. Commitment demand is negatively correlated with dynamic inconsistency, suggesting those with larger self-control problems are less likely to be aware thereof. We evaluate the welfare consequences of dynamic inconsistency and commitment policies with utility measures based on advance, immediate, and unambiguous choices. Simply offering commitment has limited welfare (and behavioural) consequences under all measures.
Publisher
Oxford University Press
Subject
This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.