Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Fast Field Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging For Quantifying Acetabular Wall Coverage: A Validation Study With Computed Tomography
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Fast Field Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging For Quantifying Acetabular Wall Coverage: A Validation Study With Computed Tomography
Do you wish to request the book?
Fast Field Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging For Quantifying Acetabular Wall Coverage: A Validation Study With Computed Tomography
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Fast Field Echo Magnetic Resonance Imaging For Quantifying Acetabular Wall Coverage: A Validation Study With Computed Tomography
2026
Overview
Background:
Acetabular morphology in hip dysplasia is typically assessed using computed tomography (CT) for bone coverage and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for soft tissues. However, agreement between CT and 3.0-T fast field echo (FFE) MRI for anterior and posterior acetabular sector angles (AASA, PASA) remains insufficiently defined.
Hypothesis:
FFE T1-weighted MRI measurements would strongly correlate with CT-based acetabular sector angles (ASAs).
Study Design:
Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.
Methods:
A total of 65 symptomatic dysplastic hips were evaluated. Two independent observers measured on CT and 3.0-T MRI scans the lateral center-edge angle (LCEA), anterior and posterior acetabular wall indices (AWI, PWI), Tönnis angle, and pelvic signs. Equatorial, intermediate, and proximal AASA and PASA were obtained on each modality. CT-MRI agreement was assessed using Spearman rho (ρ).
Results:
Intermediate AASA demonstrated strong CT-MRI correlation (ρ = 0.807), whereas equatorial and proximal AASA correlations were moderate (ρ = 0.408 and 0.398, respectively). All PASA measurements showed good MRI-CT agreement (equatorial ρ = 0.766; intermediate ρ = 0.747; proximal ρ = 0.739). AWI correlated well with CT-AASAs but weakly with MRI-derived AASAs (equatorial ρ = 0.345; intermediate ρ = 0.325; proximal ρ = 0.255).
Conclusion:
T1-weighted FFE MRI cannot currently replace CT for measuring acetabular coverage of the femoral head. Although MRI and CT seemed to correlate better at the posterior level, they did not correlate accurately anteriorly; thus, the estimation of AWI by MRI with the current echo sequence alone may lead to misinterpretation. Given that the most common type of dysplasia in the setting of normal LCEA is that with an anterior wall defect only, the authors strongly recommend using CT (or other MRI sequences) to assess patients who are potential candidates for hip joint preservation surgery.
Publisher
SAGE Publications,Sage Publications Ltd,SAGE Publishing
Subject
