Asset Details
Do you wish to reserve the book?
Patient-Reported Experiences in Vascular Surgery: A Qualitative Analysis of Care Quality
Hey, we have placed the reservation for you!
By the way, why not check out events that you can attend while you pick your title.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place the reservation. Kindly try again later.
Are you sure you want to remove the book from the shelf?
Patient-Reported Experiences in Vascular Surgery: A Qualitative Analysis of Care Quality
Do you wish to request the book?
Patient-Reported Experiences in Vascular Surgery: A Qualitative Analysis of Care Quality
Please be aware that the book you have requested cannot be checked out. If you would like to checkout this book, you can reserve another copy
We have requested the book for you!
Your request is successful and it will be processed during the Library working hours. Please check the status of your request in My Requests.
Oops! Something went wrong.
Looks like we were not able to place your request. Kindly try again later.
Journal Article
Patient-Reported Experiences in Vascular Surgery: A Qualitative Analysis of Care Quality
2025
Overview
Background:
The complexity of treatment pathways and the chronic nature of diseases in vascular surgery necessitate a patient-centred approach to improve care quality and health outcomes.
Objectives:
To explore vascular patients’ experiences, identifying key factors influencing their satisfaction and adherence to treatment.
Study Design:
Qualitative design using thematic analysis
Methods:
Seventeen semi-structured interviews were conducted with vascular patients (10 males and 7 females) from 3 vascular units in Wales. Proportional random sampling was used for participant selection based on recent vascular care, age, sex, and clinical backgrounds. Interviews were conducted in person, recorded, and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was employed to identify key themes. NVivo 10 software facilitated data management.
Results:
Six themes were identified: (i) communication and information delivery, (ii) patient involvement in decision-making, (iii) pain management, (iv) psychological and emotional support, (v) healthcare environment and systemic processes and (vi) continuity of care and post-discharge experience. While patients generally appreciated the professionalism of the healthcare staff, notable disparities emerged in communication, particularly for patients with lower health literacy or during waiting periods. Inconsistencies in discharge planning and follow-up care highlighted systemic inequities. Across all units, patients reported a lack of formal psychological support. Involvement in decision-making varied, with some patients feeling adequately included, while others experienced exclusion and anxiety.
Conclusion:
These findings reveal key areas for improvement, with communication serving as a foundational element that enhances patient involvement in decision-making, psychological support, and continuity of care. Addressing these interconnected areas, with a focus on effective communication and health equity, may help close care gaps and improve outcomes for all vascular patients.
Publisher
SAGE Publications,Sage Publications Ltd,SAGE Publishing
Subject
